Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4561 - 4570 of 64825 for records.
Search results 4561 - 4570 of 64825 for records.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
2 merit report. After reviewing the Record, counsel’s reports, and Howell’s response, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990100 - 2025-07-30
2 merit report. After reviewing the Record, counsel’s reports, and Howell’s response, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990100 - 2025-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
of the trial transcript in the appellate record, Walton forfeited her objection to the denial of her request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42800 - 2009-10-28
of the trial transcript in the appellate record, Walton forfeited her objection to the denial of her request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42800 - 2009-10-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the record and based on a false premise because, while the sewer main was public property, the sewer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125491 - 2017-09-21
by the record and based on a false premise because, while the sewer main was public property, the sewer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125491 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
, counsel’s supplemental no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131523 - 2014-12-16
, counsel’s supplemental no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131523 - 2014-12-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the time of the defendant’s trial was not to record voir dire proceedings unless it was specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70478 - 2014-09-15
at the time of the defendant’s trial was not to record voir dire proceedings unless it was specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70478 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Derrick L. Madlock
was necessary because the No. 98-2718-CR 2 record failed to sufficiently establish the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14528 - 2017-09-21
was necessary because the No. 98-2718-CR 2 record failed to sufficiently establish the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14528 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record. We conclude that no arguably meritorious issues exist for appeal. We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208569 - 2018-02-14
the record. We conclude that no arguably meritorious issues exist for appeal. We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208569 - 2018-02-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320655 - 2021-01-06
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320655 - 2021-01-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2 We note that a recording of this traffic stop, taken from Nicholas’ dashboard camera
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289601 - 2020-09-22
. 2 We note that a recording of this traffic stop, taken from Nicholas’ dashboard camera
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289601 - 2020-09-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the record and provide a transcript of the revocation hearing, both as ordered by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250322 - 2019-11-19
the record and provide a transcript of the revocation hearing, both as ordered by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250322 - 2019-11-19