Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4561 - 4570 of 63511 for records.
Search results 4561 - 4570 of 63511 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and an independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868381 - 2024-10-29
, and an independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868381 - 2024-10-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and an independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868381 - 2024-10-29
, and an independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868381 - 2024-10-29
COURT OF APPEALS
. No hearing is required when a defendant presents only conclusory allegations or if the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76820 - 2012-01-23
. No hearing is required when a defendant presents only conclusory allegations or if the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76820 - 2012-01-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion for plea withdrawal without an evidentiary hearing. After reviewing the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175701 - 2017-09-21
motion for plea withdrawal without an evidentiary hearing. After reviewing the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175701 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The defendant’s motion can be denied without a hearing if the record conclusively shows that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29358 - 2014-09-15
. The defendant’s motion can be denied without a hearing if the record conclusively shows that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29358 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2012AP1583-CRNM 2 but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105380 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2012AP1583-CRNM 2 but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105380 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94666 - 2014-09-15
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94666 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no- merit report and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241844 - 2019-06-06
of the no- merit report and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241844 - 2019-06-06
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143492 - 2015-06-29
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143492 - 2015-06-29
State v. Calvin Matthew
, the trial court did not make an adequate record of the “strong proof of guilt” required to accept an Alford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9664 - 2005-03-31
, the trial court did not make an adequate record of the “strong proof of guilt” required to accept an Alford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9664 - 2005-03-31