Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45611 - 45620 of 83901 for case number.
Search results 45611 - 45620 of 83901 for case number.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 24, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
the case as a civil forfeiture, first offense. On February 21, 1997, Shulka was convicted in Pierce County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26883 - 2006-10-23
the case as a civil forfeiture, first offense. On February 21, 1997, Shulka was convicted in Pierce County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26883 - 2006-10-23
State v. Mario D. Harrell
of review when reviewing cases involving a question of law is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis. 2d 549
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5198 - 2005-03-31
of review when reviewing cases involving a question of law is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis. 2d 549
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5198 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of methamphetamine. In September 2015, after Higbie was released on bond in that case, Higbie was charged in a new
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208152 - 2018-02-05
of methamphetamine. In September 2015, after Higbie was released on bond in that case, Higbie was charged in a new
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208152 - 2018-02-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617314 - 2023-02-02
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617314 - 2023-02-02
CA Blank Order
family. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109618 - 2014-03-24
family. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109618 - 2014-03-24
State v. Nate Wilson
sentencing in a drug case.[2] We affirm the order. ¶2 Wilson was convicted as a repeat offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4036 - 2005-03-31
sentencing in a drug case.[2] We affirm the order. ¶2 Wilson was convicted as a repeat offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4036 - 2005-03-31
Peter J. Steen v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
the owner or the operator. Thus, in the instant case, the trial court concluded that because Oligny had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12129 - 2005-03-31
the owner or the operator. Thus, in the instant case, the trial court concluded that because Oligny had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12129 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jimmie A. Woodford v. Dorothy Bolter
” and that “Woodford afraid of being interrogated by me”; • that Woodford’s lawyer “dragged case more trouble
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5442 - 2017-09-19
” and that “Woodford afraid of being interrogated by me”; • that Woodford’s lawyer “dragged case more trouble
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5442 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Harlan L. Horswill
in this case. The court observed that Horswill’s defense in this case was that the touchings may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12072 - 2017-09-21
in this case. The court observed that Horswill’s defense in this case was that the touchings may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12072 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of human behavior that would be within a jury’s knowledge, and could reasonably be used in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171402 - 2017-09-21
of human behavior that would be within a jury’s knowledge, and could reasonably be used in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171402 - 2017-09-21