Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45641 - 45650 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin M. Kelsay
demonstrated a willingness to file frivolous claims on several occasions, he has engaged in the practice
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16849 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 101
dismissing her claims against Chase Auto Finance Corporation for violations of the Wisconsin Consumer Act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99436 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Lorenzo S. Balli
of State v. Higgs, 230 Wis. 2d 1, 601 N.W.2d 653 (Ct. App. 1999) to allow review of his claim. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3181 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] David S. Frederick v. Columbia Correctional Institution
that Frederick could not prevail on the merits. Accordingly, we need not consider whether Frederick's claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8966 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. Because Sawyer’s claim had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102302 - 2013-10-01

Ruven George Seibert v. Phillip Macht
applicability of Strickland's actual-prejudice prong to Robbins's claim of ineffective assistance follows from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17592 - 2005-03-31

State v. Daniel L. Hanson
moved to withdraw his no contest plea, claiming dissatisfaction with Ribbens’s representation because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4806 - 2005-03-31

State v. David A. Emery
a vehicle while intoxicated, second offense, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) (1997-98).[2] He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2534 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Nigel R. Burgess
postconviction motion, Burgess seeks to withdraw his guilty plea, claiming it was entered unknowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21188 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
that this purported failure caused him harm or prejudice. Therefore, we reject this claim. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30999 - 2014-09-15