Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45661 - 45670 of 54925 for n c c.

COURT OF APPEALS
as a claim of newly discovered evidence. See State v. Kivioja, 225 Wis. 2d 271, 279 n.3, 592 N.W.2d 220
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31119 - 2007-12-10

[PDF] NOTICE
different.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. Prejudice must be “affirmatively prove[n].” State v. Wirts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31655 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
, No. 2001AP598-CR, unpublished slip op., ¶¶4, 5 n.2 (WI App Oct. 9, 2001). ¶8 More than a decade later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134123 - 2015-02-02

CA Blank Order
Cox of the breakdown between the potential terms of confinement and extended supervision. Id., ¶42 n
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134789 - 2015-02-10

[PDF] State v. Ricky A. Myhre
: [I]n the course of the proof at trial the judge may gather a fuller appreciation of the nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25935 - 2017-09-21

Glenn F. Plautz By Charlotte Pagel v. Time Insurance Company
., 189 Wis.2d at 158 n.8, 525 N.W.2d at 351 n.8. We did not decide that there was sufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10001 - 2005-03-31

State v. Tommie S. Gray
of human life. Dolan, 44 Wis.2d at 74 n.2, 170 N.W.2d at 825. Inasmuch as a general intent to do harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12632 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Company v. James Pfantz
and subject to an action in conversion. See id. at 118 n.10, 479 N.W.2d at 563. We conclude that the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8531 - 2017-09-19

Col D'var Graphics, Inc. v. Forrester Enterprises, Inc.
Reiman Assocs., Inc. v. R/A Advertising, Inc., 102 Wis.2d 305, 306 n.1, 306 N.W.2d 292, 294 n.1 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8275 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffry D. Paterson
. This is because “[i]n some situations a citizen has a lesser expectation of privacy in an automobile.” Id. at 169
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12755 - 2005-03-31