Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4571 - 4580 of 63706 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 4571 - 4580 of 63706 for Motion for joint custody.
Frontsheet
," that the "Child's best interests will be served by being in [the Roseckys'] legal custody and physical placement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99308 - 2013-07-10
," that the "Child's best interests will be served by being in [the Roseckys'] legal custody and physical placement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99308 - 2013-07-10
[PDF]
WI 66
interests will be served by being in [the Roseckys'] legal custody and physical placement," and that "[t
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99308 - 2014-09-15
interests will be served by being in [the Roseckys'] legal custody and physical placement," and that "[t
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99308 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
custody of his son K.T. After a hearing, the trial court denied Mr. G’s motion. This appeal follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152379 - 2017-09-21
custody of his son K.T. After a hearing, the trial court denied Mr. G’s motion. This appeal follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152379 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
carpometacarpal joint. Ford returned to Dr. Chamoy because of continued pain. Dr. Chamoy performed surgery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99731 - 2014-09-15
carpometacarpal joint. Ford returned to Dr. Chamoy because of continued pain. Dr. Chamoy performed surgery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99731 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 23, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
a slight subluxation[3] of the first carpometacarpal joint. Ford returned to Dr. Chamoy because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99731 - 2013-07-22
a slight subluxation[3] of the first carpometacarpal joint. Ford returned to Dr. Chamoy because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99731 - 2013-07-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the dismissal, as a read-in offense, of the resisting count and for a joint sentencing recommendation of three
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084626 - 2026-03-03
for the dismissal, as a read-in offense, of the resisting count and for a joint sentencing recommendation of three
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084626 - 2026-03-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that was presented in open court. In exchange for Brooks’ plea, the State agreed to make a joint recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133591 - 2017-09-21
that was presented in open court. In exchange for Brooks’ plea, the State agreed to make a joint recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133591 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be dismissed as a read-in offense. The parties also agreed to make a joint sentencing recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=758136 - 2024-02-06
be dismissed as a read-in offense. The parties also agreed to make a joint sentencing recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=758136 - 2024-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the dismissal, as a read-in offense, of the resisting count and for a joint sentencing recommendation of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084626 - 2026-03-03
for the dismissal, as a read-in offense, of the resisting count and for a joint sentencing recommendation of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084626 - 2026-03-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in that case would be dismissed and read in; and that the parties would make a joint sentence recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976934 - 2025-07-01
in that case would be dismissed and read in; and that the parties would make a joint sentence recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976934 - 2025-07-01