Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4571 - 4580 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 4571 - 4580 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
Act. ¶7 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment, employing the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29517 - 2007-06-27
Act. ¶7 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment, employing the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29517 - 2007-06-27
Nina Kennedy v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services
that the case involved a legal error which the director could decide. The director reviewed the case de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8933 - 2005-03-31
that the case involved a legal error which the director could decide. The director reviewed the case de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8933 - 2005-03-31
State v. Equinees Boyles
. It therefore presents a question of law reviewed de novo. Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12790 - 2005-03-31
. It therefore presents a question of law reviewed de novo. Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12790 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was a petition for writ of mandamus for open records, the standard of review is de novo. The standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540095 - 2022-07-06
was a petition for writ of mandamus for open records, the standard of review is de novo. The standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540095 - 2022-07-06
[PDF]
State v. Trenton McAdoo
such allegations presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. [I]f the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13311 - 2017-09-21
such allegations presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. [I]f the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13311 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2023AP2339 6 review de novo.” Waukesha County v. J.W.J., 2017 WI 57, ¶15, 375 Wis. 2d 542, 895 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=829695 - 2024-07-23
. No. 2023AP2339 6 review de novo.” Waukesha County v. J.W.J., 2017 WI 57, ¶15, 375 Wis. 2d 542, 895 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=829695 - 2024-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a motion for de novo review and contempt. ¶6 On March 16, 2011, a hearing was held before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81584 - 2012-04-30
filed a motion for de novo review and contempt. ¶6 On March 16, 2011, a hearing was held before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81584 - 2012-04-30
COURT OF APPEALS
review decisions on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See M
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48356 - 2010-03-30
review decisions on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See M
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48356 - 2010-03-30
[PDF]
William Farina v. Meridian Group, Inc.
requested a trial de novo in circuit court under § 799.207(3), STATS. At trial, Farina, appearing pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12915 - 2017-09-21
requested a trial de novo in circuit court under § 799.207(3), STATS. At trial, Farina, appearing pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12915 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Stutesman
of the constitutional right to present evidence is a question of “constitutional fact,” which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13134 - 2017-09-21
of the constitutional right to present evidence is a question of “constitutional fact,” which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13134 - 2017-09-21