Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4571 - 4580 of 69092 for he.
Search results 4571 - 4580 of 69092 for he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for postconviction relief. He contends that prosecutorial No. 2011AP1759-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87126 - 2014-09-15
motion for postconviction relief. He contends that prosecutorial No. 2011AP1759-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87126 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of these elements beyond a reasonable doubt. The victim testified at trial that he was driving home from work
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619427 - 2023-02-07
of these elements beyond a reasonable doubt. The victim testified at trial that he was driving home from work
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619427 - 2023-02-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
plea. He argues in the alternative that the court should not have accepted his plea because, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34660 - 2014-09-15
plea. He argues in the alternative that the court should not have accepted his plea because, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34660 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mitchell Miller
he pled guilty to armed robbery, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 943.32(2) (2003-04).[1] He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20327 - 2007-06-04
he pled guilty to armed robbery, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 943.32(2) (2003-04).[1] He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20327 - 2007-06-04
[PDF]
Leopoldo Balderas, Jr. v. City of Milwaukee
advised Balderas that he could appeal the order to the Standards and Appeals Commission (SAC). Balderas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15581 - 2017-09-21
advised Balderas that he could appeal the order to the Standards and Appeals Commission (SAC). Balderas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15581 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joseph F. Michalkiewicz
for postconviction relief. Michalkiewicz was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide. He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21090 - 2017-09-21
for postconviction relief. Michalkiewicz was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide. He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21090 - 2017-09-21
County of Outagamie v. Kenneth C. Luedke
, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats.[1] He contends that the trial court erred by admitting evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14092 - 2005-03-31
, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats.[1] He contends that the trial court erred by admitting evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14092 - 2005-03-31
City of Sheboygan v. Korry L. Ardell
suspension (OAS). He argues that a stipulation he signed did not accurately reflect what he thought he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26068 - 2006-08-01
suspension (OAS). He argues that a stipulation he signed did not accurately reflect what he thought he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26068 - 2006-08-01
State v. Kevin M. Salm
). Therefore, Salm asserts that he did not wrongfully refuse to submit to evidentiary testing of his breath
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15446 - 2005-03-31
). Therefore, Salm asserts that he did not wrongfully refuse to submit to evidentiary testing of his breath
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15446 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William Faison
and first- degree reckless injury, contrary to §§ 940.01(1) and 940.23(1), STATS. He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12576 - 2017-09-21
and first- degree reckless injury, contrary to §§ 940.01(1) and 940.23(1), STATS. He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12576 - 2017-09-21