Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4571 - 4580 of 57317 for id.
Search results 4571 - 4580 of 57317 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
the correct legal standard to the facts of record and reached a reasonable result. Id. ¶5 Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65159 - 2011-05-31
the correct legal standard to the facts of record and reached a reasonable result. Id. ¶5 Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65159 - 2011-05-31
[PDF]
CVW v. Lawrence M. Stress
principle “is widely accepted and applied, in the absence of legislation to the contrary.” Id. (emphasis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15062 - 2017-09-21
principle “is widely accepted and applied, in the absence of legislation to the contrary.” Id. (emphasis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15062 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Dawn C.
interests must be accommodated. Id., ¶22. When the government seeks to terminate parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7657 - 2017-09-19
interests must be accommodated. Id., ¶22. When the government seeks to terminate parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7657 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
City of Sheboygan v. Alonna L. Koenig
.” Id. When the statutory language is clear and unambiguous, No. 03-1713 5 we arrive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6625 - 2017-09-19
.” Id. When the statutory language is clear and unambiguous, No. 03-1713 5 we arrive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6625 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
id., ¶20. ¶9 “Whether someone has been seized presents a two-part standard of review.” County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195870 - 2017-09-21
id., ¶20. ¶9 “Whether someone has been seized presents a two-part standard of review.” County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195870 - 2017-09-21
07AP1728 Alan Dordel v. Arlyn W. Nofke
if it provides a basis for the court’s exercise of discretion. Id., ¶25 (citations omitted). ¶9 Mucek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32948 - 2008-06-10
if it provides a basis for the court’s exercise of discretion. Id., ¶25 (citations omitted). ¶9 Mucek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32948 - 2008-06-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
acted reasonably, and do not interfere with the sentence if discretion was properly exercised. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145097 - 2017-09-21
acted reasonably, and do not interfere with the sentence if discretion was properly exercised. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145097 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
a basis for the court’s exercise of discretion. Id., ¶25 (citations omitted). No. 2007AP1728
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32948 - 2014-09-15
a basis for the court’s exercise of discretion. Id., ¶25 (citations omitted). No. 2007AP1728
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32948 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Lisa L. Lappley
, that the “defendant probably committed [the offense].” Id. at 356-357 (citations omitted). ¶10 “The State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19776 - 2017-09-21
, that the “defendant probably committed [the offense].” Id. at 356-357 (citations omitted). ¶10 “The State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19776 - 2017-09-21
State v. Calvin R. Clemons
not erroneously exercise its discretion. See id. Our standard of review is one of deference because the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12299 - 2005-03-31
not erroneously exercise its discretion. See id. Our standard of review is one of deference because the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12299 - 2005-03-31