Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4571 - 4580 of 40447 for probate forms/1000.
Search results 4571 - 4580 of 40447 for probate forms/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court stay those sentences and impose a three-year term of probation. The agreement allowed the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612431 - 2023-01-25
court stay those sentences and impose a three-year term of probation. The agreement allowed the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612431 - 2023-01-25
[PDF]
State v. Scott C. Anderson
a “lengthy, imposed and stayed prison [sentence] with probation to run concurrent to any sentence [Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12332 - 2017-09-21
a “lengthy, imposed and stayed prison [sentence] with probation to run concurrent to any sentence [Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12332 - 2017-09-21
State v. Scott C. Anderson
[sentence] with probation to run concurrent to any sentence [Anderson] is currently serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12332 - 2005-03-31
[sentence] with probation to run concurrent to any sentence [Anderson] is currently serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12332 - 2005-03-31
Micheal Locklear v. David H. Schwarz
for certiorari review of his probation revocation. Locklear argues that the circuit court erred when it held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16290 - 2005-03-31
for certiorari review of his probation revocation. Locklear argues that the circuit court erred when it held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16290 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Micheal Locklear v. David H. Schwarz
of the circuit court dismissing No. 99-3211 2 his petition for certiorari review of his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16290 - 2017-09-21
of the circuit court dismissing No. 99-3211 2 his petition for certiorari review of his probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16290 - 2017-09-21
State v. John A. Rupp
revocation of probation and from an order denying his motion for sentence modification based on a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2864 - 2005-03-31
revocation of probation and from an order denying his motion for sentence modification based on a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2864 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
probation revocation and from orders denying his Nos. 2009AP1500-CR 2009AP1501-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52989 - 2014-09-15
probation revocation and from orders denying his Nos. 2009AP1500-CR 2009AP1501-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52989 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals from judgments of conviction entered after probation revocation and from orders denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52989 - 2010-08-09
appeals from judgments of conviction entered after probation revocation and from orders denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52989 - 2010-08-09
[PDF]
State v. John A. Rupp
after revocation of probation and from an order denying his motion for sentence modification based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2864 - 2017-09-19
after revocation of probation and from an order denying his motion for sentence modification based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2864 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
bite down.” [KL] told [Sanders] that she had been contacted by his probation agent about writing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189521 - 2017-09-21
bite down.” [KL] told [Sanders] that she had been contacted by his probation agent about writing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189521 - 2017-09-21

