Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4571 - 4580 of 63485 for records.
Search results 4571 - 4580 of 63485 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2020AP1048-CRNM 2 independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602060 - 2022-12-21
. No. 2020AP1048-CRNM 2 independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602060 - 2022-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194889 - 2017-09-21
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194889 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
considering the no- merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146880 - 2017-09-21
considering the no- merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146880 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Calvin Matthew
an adequate record of the “strong proof of guilt” required to accept an Alford plea. State v. Garcia, 192
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9664 - 2017-09-19
an adequate record of the “strong proof of guilt” required to accept an Alford plea. State v. Garcia, 192
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9664 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
memoranda and the record, we affirm. In his complaint against the Association, Laatsch alleged breach
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187158 - 2017-09-21
memoranda and the record, we affirm. In his complaint against the Association, Laatsch alleged breach
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187158 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the appellant’s No. 2023AP1122 2 brief and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074676 - 2026-02-10
. Based upon our review of the appellant’s No. 2023AP1122 2 brief and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074676 - 2026-02-10
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Miller
acted reasonably, and the defendant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2410 - 2017-09-19
acted reasonably, and the defendant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2410 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2012AP1583-CRNM 2 but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105380 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2012AP1583-CRNM 2 but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105380 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
by cites to the record. Our review of the testimony shows that Kielisch was permitted to testify about his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28366 - 2007-03-07
by cites to the record. Our review of the testimony shows that Kielisch was permitted to testify about his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28366 - 2007-03-07
CA Blank Order
review of the record as required by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude that no issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117319 - 2014-07-22
review of the record as required by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude that no issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117319 - 2014-07-22