Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4571 - 4580 of 59807 for richard riley divorce attorney.

Barbara E. Decker-Sidmore v. Kenneth D. Sidmore
Sidmore appeals from a judgment of divorce seeking reversal of a trial court determination that Barbara E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6075 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Barbara E. Decker-Sidmore v. Kenneth D. Sidmore
appeals from a judgment of divorce seeking reversal of a trial court determination that Barbara E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6075 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the respondent-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Jessica Roulette
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32131 - 2008-04-29

State v. Gerald A. Cholewinski
and a postconviction order.[1] The state public defender appointed Attorney Jack E. Schairer as Cholewinski's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8092 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Gerald A. Cholewinski
and a postconviction order.1 The state public defender appointed Attorney Jack E. Schairer as Cholewinski's appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8092 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Disposition Table for January & February 2014
/19/2014 2011AP2457 Charles C. Downing v. Richard Raemisch 01/13/2014 2011AP2849-CR State v
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109134 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” State v. Richards, 2020 WI App 48, ¶21, 393 Wis. 2d 772, 948 N.W.2d 359. “First, we uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970394 - 2025-06-18

[PDF] WI APP 176
Complete Title of Case: †Petition for Review filed STATE OF WISCONSIN EX REL. RICHARD A. FORD
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26141 - 2014-09-15

2006 WI APP 176
Complete Title of Case: †Petition for Review filed State of Wisconsin ex rel. Richard A. Ford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26141 - 2006-09-26

Carole H. Schmidt v. Waukesha State Bank
the defendant-appellant there were briefs and oral argument by Cramer, Multhauf & Hammes, with Richard R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9318 - 2005-03-31