Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45701 - 45710 of 68502 for did.
Search results 45701 - 45710 of 68502 for did.
State v. Jordan D. Starling
violated his Fourth Amendment rights because the officer did not have probable cause to arrest him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26562 - 2006-09-26
violated his Fourth Amendment rights because the officer did not have probable cause to arrest him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26562 - 2006-09-26
State v. Michael J. W.
. The trial court did not consider that the probability of paternity was increased by combining the results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9857 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court did not consider that the probability of paternity was increased by combining the results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9857 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 25, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
mortgages, which secured those debts. This suit did not involve Scott and Victoria’s Home Equity Line
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130141 - 2014-11-24
mortgages, which secured those debts. This suit did not involve Scott and Victoria’s Home Equity Line
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130141 - 2014-11-24
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s performance was deficient, he cannot show prejudice. Lor does not provide—nor did he provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81719 - 2012-05-17
counsel’s performance was deficient, he cannot show prejudice. Lor does not provide—nor did he provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81719 - 2012-05-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ruling at her recommitment hearing did not satisfy the requirements set forth in Langlade County v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=452956 - 2021-11-12
ruling at her recommitment hearing did not satisfy the requirements set forth in Langlade County v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=452956 - 2021-11-12
[PDF]
State v. Nathaniel A. Lindell
to the victim did not make her more or less willing to accept the defense theory of the case: that Lindell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16114 - 2017-09-21
to the victim did not make her more or less willing to accept the defense theory of the case: that Lindell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16114 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. W.
laboratory was less than 99%, the instruction was not appropriate. The trial court did not consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9857 - 2017-09-19
laboratory was less than 99%, the instruction was not appropriate. The trial court did not consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9857 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
order must be reversed because the County did not provide sufficient testimony to meet its burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632735 - 2023-03-14
order must be reversed because the County did not provide sufficient testimony to meet its burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632735 - 2023-03-14
Patricia Cavey v. James A. Walrath
-reimbursement program were included, but that the Society did not exceed this fifty-percent threshold if those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13505 - 2005-03-31
-reimbursement program were included, but that the Society did not exceed this fifty-percent threshold if those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13505 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the medications. ¶20 Notably, the trial court did not completely bar Hammake from testifying about the PDR’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95104 - 2013-04-08
of the medications. ¶20 Notably, the trial court did not completely bar Hammake from testifying about the PDR’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95104 - 2013-04-08