Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45711 - 45720 of 62393 for child support.
Search results 45711 - 45720 of 62393 for child support.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
; the jury instructions; the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdicts; and the sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959044 - 2025-05-20
; the jury instructions; the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdicts; and the sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959044 - 2025-05-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
support the deputy’s credibility in the court’s eyes, as this observation was contemporaneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=755533 - 2024-01-31
support the deputy’s credibility in the court’s eyes, as this observation was contemporaneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=755533 - 2024-01-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel L. Gaulrapp
. at ___, 117 S. Ct. at 421. The trial court here made extensive findings, and the record supports its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10688 - 2017-09-20
. at ___, 117 S. Ct. at 421. The trial court here made extensive findings, and the record supports its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10688 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the incident, and that had prevented him from providing testimony that would be sufficient to support a self
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738911 - 2023-12-12
the incident, and that had prevented him from providing testimony that would be sufficient to support a self
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738911 - 2023-12-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court erroneously exercised its discretion because it “did not consider Mr. Russell’s need to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72328 - 2014-09-15
court erroneously exercised its discretion because it “did not consider Mr. Russell’s need to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72328 - 2014-09-15
State v. Cory T. Baker
, that the evidence was insufficient to support the recklessly endangering safety convictions and that he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14871 - 2005-03-31
, that the evidence was insufficient to support the recklessly endangering safety convictions and that he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14871 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the allegations of the complaint, expressly alleged negligence, denied that its contract with Jeneil supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211407 - 2018-04-25
the allegations of the complaint, expressly alleged negligence, denied that its contract with Jeneil supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211407 - 2018-04-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the trial court was wrong because the facts would not have supported a robbery charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145097 - 2017-09-21
argues that the trial court was wrong because the facts would not have supported a robbery charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145097 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not support plea withdrawal because there is no suggestion that Harris could show that his plea is likely
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290262 - 2020-09-23
not support plea withdrawal because there is no suggestion that Harris could show that his plea is likely
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290262 - 2020-09-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
; the jury instructions; the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdicts; and the sentences
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959044 - 2025-05-20
; the jury instructions; the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdicts; and the sentences
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959044 - 2025-05-20