Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45711 - 45720 of 62336 for child support.
Search results 45711 - 45720 of 62336 for child support.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
if the officer has a reasonable suspicion supported by articulable facts that criminal activity may be afoot
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220597 - 2018-10-03
if the officer has a reasonable suspicion supported by articulable facts that criminal activity may be afoot
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220597 - 2018-10-03
Gene Lessor v. Edward Wangelin, Jr.
, that the appeal or cross-appeal was without any reasonable basis in law or equity and could not be supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13127 - 2005-03-31
, that the appeal or cross-appeal was without any reasonable basis in law or equity and could not be supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13127 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1968)). Rather, an officer’s reasonable suspicion must be No. 2018AP174-CR 5 supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232688 - 2019-01-25
(1968)). Rather, an officer’s reasonable suspicion must be No. 2018AP174-CR 5 supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232688 - 2019-01-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
them. In support of her “order of announcement” argument, she points to WIS. STAT. § 973.15(2m)(b)2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223918 - 2018-10-23
them. In support of her “order of announcement” argument, she points to WIS. STAT. § 973.15(2m)(b)2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223918 - 2018-10-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
because “[r]everse lights and revving an engine does not support that Mr. Matlock was going to flee
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252647 - 2020-01-17
because “[r]everse lights and revving an engine does not support that Mr. Matlock was going to flee
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252647 - 2020-01-17
COURT OF APPEALS
did not support a reasonable suspicion. He points to the fact that the officer never witnessed any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33044 - 2008-06-16
did not support a reasonable suspicion. He points to the fact that the officer never witnessed any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33044 - 2008-06-16
State v. Edward Lee Hennings
whether there is a reasonable doubt as to this element. In other words, does the record support a finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12590 - 2005-03-31
whether there is a reasonable doubt as to this element. In other words, does the record support a finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12590 - 2005-03-31
State v. Diane M. Somers
. In this case, the district attorney did appear for the State, and Somers has offered no authority to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11460 - 2005-03-31
. In this case, the district attorney did appear for the State, and Somers has offered no authority to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11460 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
there are facts which would support the court’s decision had it properly exercised its discretion. See Hines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107109 - 2017-09-21
there are facts which would support the court’s decision had it properly exercised its discretion. See Hines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107109 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the exclusion supports an interpretation that Evanston agreed to provide or that Hendrix believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37243 - 2014-09-15
of the exclusion supports an interpretation that Evanston agreed to provide or that Hendrix believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37243 - 2014-09-15