Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45711 - 45720 of 68502 for did.
Search results 45711 - 45720 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
State v. John S. Cooper
on counts two and six violated his right to due process because they did not allow for a unanimous verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5588 - 2017-09-19
on counts two and six violated his right to due process because they did not allow for a unanimous verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5588 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
was to be served consecutive to No. 1999CF384, and that the erroneous interim amendment did not alter the intended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131934 - 2014-12-22
was to be served consecutive to No. 1999CF384, and that the erroneous interim amendment did not alter the intended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131934 - 2014-12-22
[PDF]
State v. John Henry Balsewicz
on and Balsewicz repeatedly responded that he did.” The State, however, overstates the record, and misconceives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15251 - 2017-09-21
on and Balsewicz repeatedly responded that he did.” The State, however, overstates the record, and misconceives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15251 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
3 Bounds did not explain his basis for requesting 326 days of sentence credit. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955313 - 2025-05-13
3 Bounds did not explain his basis for requesting 326 days of sentence credit. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955313 - 2025-05-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for leave to appeal asked several times for a stay of the circuit court order, but the petition did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=889958 - 2024-12-11
for leave to appeal asked several times for a stay of the circuit court order, but the petition did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=889958 - 2024-12-11
Howard R. Millen v. James Thomas
the easement, it changed its opinion, concluding that the easement “did not increase access to the lake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9298 - 2005-03-31
the easement, it changed its opinion, concluding that the easement “did not increase access to the lake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9298 - 2005-03-31
Faye V. Monicken v. John M. Monicken
, given that John did not comply with the amended judgment, we must address whether § 767.32(1m) and (1r
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14621 - 2005-03-31
, given that John did not comply with the amended judgment, we must address whether § 767.32(1m) and (1r
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14621 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Thomas J. Pionke v. Town of Dayton
and did not err in reversing the board and upholding the taxpayers’ argument for a $148,778 valuation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13972 - 2014-09-15
and did not err in reversing the board and upholding the taxpayers’ argument for a $148,778 valuation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13972 - 2014-09-15
Rule Order
. ANNETTE KINGSLAND ZIEGLER, J., did not participate. Dated at Madison, Wisconsin, this 19th day of October
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30688 - 2007-10-18
. ANNETTE KINGSLAND ZIEGLER, J., did not participate. Dated at Madison, Wisconsin, this 19th day of October
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30688 - 2007-10-18
State v. Romell Lampley
. This was not a situation that he did not have control of. He should have had control of it. He could have had control
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2342 - 2005-03-31
. This was not a situation that he did not have control of. He should have had control of it. He could have had control
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2342 - 2005-03-31