Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45731 - 45740 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 45731 - 45740 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
State v. Randolph M. Martin
denying his request to vacate the judgment. Martin claims the trial court erred when it entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6327 - 2017-09-19
denying his request to vacate the judgment. Martin claims the trial court erred when it entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6327 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. Because Sawyer’s claim had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102302 - 2013-10-01
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. Because Sawyer’s claim had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102302 - 2013-10-01
Ruven George Seibert v. Phillip Macht
applicability of Strickland's actual-prejudice prong to Robbins's claim of ineffective assistance follows from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17592 - 2005-03-31
applicability of Strickland's actual-prejudice prong to Robbins's claim of ineffective assistance follows from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17592 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
record is missing exhibits M, N, and O, which he submitted at the hearing. Soto claims these exhibits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81185 - 2014-04-29
record is missing exhibits M, N, and O, which he submitted at the hearing. Soto claims these exhibits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81185 - 2014-04-29
COURT OF APPEALS
, 152 Wis. 2d at 534 n.5.[3] ¶6 To the extent Lear’s argument could be construed as a claim his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35549 - 2010-03-01
, 152 Wis. 2d at 534 n.5.[3] ¶6 To the extent Lear’s argument could be construed as a claim his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35549 - 2010-03-01
Amy S. Plummer v. Tina M. Roberts
claimed that she was a nonmarital child of Robert and petitioned for an order affirming her status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4805 - 2005-03-31
claimed that she was a nonmarital child of Robert and petitioned for an order affirming her status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4805 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel L. Hanson
moved to withdraw his no contest plea, claiming dissatisfaction with Ribbens’s representation because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4806 - 2005-03-31
moved to withdraw his no contest plea, claiming dissatisfaction with Ribbens’s representation because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4806 - 2005-03-31
State v. David A. Emery
a vehicle while intoxicated, second offense, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) (1997-98).[2] He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2534 - 2005-03-31
a vehicle while intoxicated, second offense, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) (1997-98).[2] He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2534 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
motion (Alexander’s fourth), he moved pro se to vacate his judgment of conviction for the claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28150 - 2014-09-15
motion (Alexander’s fourth), he moved pro se to vacate his judgment of conviction for the claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28150 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Nigel R. Burgess
postconviction motion, Burgess seeks to withdraw his guilty plea, claiming it was entered unknowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21188 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion, Burgess seeks to withdraw his guilty plea, claiming it was entered unknowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21188 - 2017-09-21