Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45751 - 45760 of 83896 for case number.
Search results 45751 - 45760 of 83896 for case number.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
in two cases joined for trial in which the jury found Medina guilty of six crimes. In Milwaukee County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104190 - 2017-09-21
in two cases joined for trial in which the jury found Medina guilty of six crimes. In Milwaukee County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104190 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jesse R.J.
Wilcox, the case social worker. Wilcox informed the court of the ongoing confusion regarding Jesse’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12283 - 2005-03-31
Wilcox, the case social worker. Wilcox informed the court of the ongoing confusion regarding Jesse’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12283 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719469 - 2023-10-26
not responded. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719469 - 2023-10-26
Synthia O'Grady v. Michael S. O'Grady
to respond to interrogatories O’Grady had served on him because that judge was not a party to the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25967 - 2006-07-19
to respond to interrogatories O’Grady had served on him because that judge was not a party to the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25967 - 2006-07-19
[PDF]
State v. Edward J. Thompson
test required by the implied consent law. He argues that the officer in this case exceeded his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13532 - 2017-09-21
test required by the implied consent law. He argues that the officer in this case exceeded his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13532 - 2017-09-21
Judy Patricia Bushmaker v. Green Bay Diocese of The Roman Catholic Church
wrongly, during a civil lawsuit, referred to Witczak’s no contest pleas in the criminal case; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11508 - 2005-03-31
wrongly, during a civil lawsuit, referred to Witczak’s no contest pleas in the criminal case; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11508 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103112 - 2013-10-14
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103112 - 2013-10-14
[PDF]
Patrick DeMauro v. Peter R. Szukis
and reverse the judgment. This case is a foreclosure action by DeMauro against Szukis. After trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12434 - 2017-09-21
and reverse the judgment. This case is a foreclosure action by DeMauro against Szukis. After trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12434 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Supreme Court Rule petition 15-01 - Comments from Ball
that it cannot take on Wisconsin’s most egregious cases of attorney misconduct, then the staffing problem
/supreme/docs/1501commentsball.pdf - 2015-08-31
that it cannot take on Wisconsin’s most egregious cases of attorney misconduct, then the staffing problem
/supreme/docs/1501commentsball.pdf - 2015-08-31
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - 11-13-2023 Court Order
of Supreme Court FILED 11-13-2023 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 11-13-2023 Court
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1113order.pdf - 2023-11-13
of Supreme Court FILED 11-13-2023 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 11-13-2023 Court
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1113order.pdf - 2023-11-13