Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45751 - 45760 of 62360 for child support.
Search results 45751 - 45760 of 62360 for child support.
COURT OF APPEALS
facts” uncovered by his trial counsel, which supported his defense. Mckee, however, goes on to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145914 - 2015-08-10
facts” uncovered by his trial counsel, which supported his defense. Mckee, however, goes on to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145914 - 2015-08-10
State v. Terrance D. Prude
plea withdrawal; (7) record support for the reasons for seeking plea withdrawal; and (8) the potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25065 - 2006-05-08
plea withdrawal; (7) record support for the reasons for seeking plea withdrawal; and (8) the potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25065 - 2006-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court, and on appeal, Richardson provides no authority to support his contention that a third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45677 - 2010-01-12
the trial court, and on appeal, Richardson provides no authority to support his contention that a third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45677 - 2010-01-12
State v. Russell L. Zuerner
instead of as a second offender. In support of his motion to disallow his 1993 criminal OMVWI conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4344 - 2005-03-31
instead of as a second offender. In support of his motion to disallow his 1993 criminal OMVWI conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4344 - 2005-03-31
WI App 62 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP612 Complete Title of ...
agree. The record supports the Mattfelds’ contention that they are entitled to relief from judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61241 - 2012-01-22
agree. The record supports the Mattfelds’ contention that they are entitled to relief from judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61241 - 2012-01-22
State v. Norman D. Stapleton
Stapleton’s arguments. ¶16 First, the cases Stapleton cites do not support his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2597 - 2005-03-31
Stapleton’s arguments. ¶16 First, the cases Stapleton cites do not support his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2597 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of his guilty plea. These findings are not clearly erroneous and support a determination that plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279070 - 2020-08-19
of his guilty plea. These findings are not clearly erroneous and support a determination that plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279070 - 2020-08-19
[PDF]
State v. James E. Robinson
is intertwined with factual findings supporting that conclusion. Therefore, it is appropriate that this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15425 - 2017-09-21
is intertwined with factual findings supporting that conclusion. Therefore, it is appropriate that this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15425 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
upon the State’s failure to provide timely discovery. In support of these claims, Dorton alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667870 - 2023-06-13
upon the State’s failure to provide timely discovery. In support of these claims, Dorton alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667870 - 2023-06-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is limited to whether there is substantial evidence to support the revocation. See Washington, 239 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135522 - 2017-09-21
is limited to whether there is substantial evidence to support the revocation. See Washington, 239 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135522 - 2017-09-21