Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45751 - 45760 of 62360 for child support.

[PDF] State v. James E. Robinson
is intertwined with factual findings supporting that conclusion. Therefore, it is appropriate that this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15425 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
upon the State’s failure to provide timely discovery. In support of these claims, Dorton alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667870 - 2023-06-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is limited to whether there is substantial evidence to support the revocation. See Washington, 239 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135522 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
determination to support a finding of consent while at the same time rely on Mr. Harris’[s] discredited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87090 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Roger M. Spencer
. Sharpee, 154 Wis. 2d 515, 518, 453 N.W.2d 508 (Ct. App. 1990). ¶7 In support of his position
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2483 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
benefits for Health Plus.” In support of his position, Loebel proffered letters, memoranda, and e-mails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29256 - 2007-06-04

Clara M. Rolland v. County of Milwaukee
to the wheels as possible. Three wheel “scooters”, for example, have little support on the extension directly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15771 - 2005-03-31

State v. Joseph Eckstein
will not support a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Id. at 464-65. ¶16 Here, Eckstein’s lead trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5713 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Cori E. Jeffers
Amendment, appeared to be directed at the sufficiency of the evidence to support the charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12182 - 2017-09-21

State v. Martin Anthony Azevedo
the PBT result to be used as evidence supporting the officer’s decision to arrest Azevedo. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4695 - 2005-03-31