Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4581 - 4590 of 29916 for des.
Search results 4581 - 4590 of 29916 for des.
[PDF]
Fariba Baylis v. State
that we review de novo. See Miller v. Wal-Mart Stores, 219 Wis.2d 250, 271, 580 N.W.2d 233, 242 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15486 - 2017-09-21
that we review de novo. See Miller v. Wal-Mart Stores, 219 Wis.2d 250, 271, 580 N.W.2d 233, 242 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15486 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert J. Trokan
of the parties. Michels, 150 Wis. 2d at 96. On appeal, we review this question de novo. Id. at 97. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6532 - 2005-03-31
of the parties. Michels, 150 Wis. 2d at 96. On appeal, we review this question de novo. Id. at 97. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6532 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review decisions on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See M
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48356 - 2010-03-30
review decisions on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See M
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48356 - 2010-03-30
[PDF]
State v. James R. Walz
a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 DEININGER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6715 - 2017-09-20
a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 DEININGER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6715 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2023AP2339 6 review de novo.” Waukesha County v. J.W.J., 2017 WI 57, ¶15, 375 Wis. 2d 542, 895 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=829695 - 2024-07-23
. No. 2023AP2339 6 review de novo.” Waukesha County v. J.W.J., 2017 WI 57, ¶15, 375 Wis. 2d 542, 895 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=829695 - 2024-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33426 - 2008-07-16
: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33426 - 2008-07-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
commissioner ordered the parties to attend mediation, and Kristin filed a motion for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81584 - 2014-09-15
commissioner ordered the parties to attend mediation, and Kristin filed a motion for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81584 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 185
of law that we review de novo. Haase, 293 Wis. 2d 322, ¶5. Our interpretation of § 973.20 is guided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34461 - 2014-09-15
of law that we review de novo. Haase, 293 Wis. 2d 322, ¶5. Our interpretation of § 973.20 is guided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34461 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Randall and Roberta Spence v. Thomas and Diane Kolodzienski
review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5190 - 2017-09-19
review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5190 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
The interpretation and application of a statute to a set of facts presents questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142512 - 2015-05-27
The interpretation and application of a statute to a set of facts presents questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142512 - 2015-05-27