Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4581 - 4590 of 12294 for o's.

COURT OF APPEALS
of judgments or settlements.” The definition excludes any vehicle “[o]wned by any governmental unit or agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110073 - 2014-04-08

[PDF] State v. Rory D. Revels
are to be interpreted, among other things, “[t]o promote the ascertainment of truth in trial by requiring timely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13200 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
explained that “[t]o safeguard the accuracy of the PSI, the probation and parole agent preparing the report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33656 - 2008-08-05

Ashland County v. Lisa R.
for the scheduling of the dispositional hearing, she cites State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d 663
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6349 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
are accounted for and safe.” No. 2023AP2346 7 responded by saying, “[G]o ahead write me a BDR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841115 - 2024-09-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
could “[g]o ahead and search [the apartment]” and that “[t]here’s not going to be any heroin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181781 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that test, “[o]ffenses are not identical in law if each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=334301 - 2021-02-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, exclusive of any other right,” and “[o]nly to the extent that it is actually occupied.” In addition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182229 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
(Ct. App. 1992), in which we explained that “[t]o safeguard the accuracy of the PSI, the probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33656 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and staff required that “commands have to be followed without resistance [and t]o resist or obstruct under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181189 - 2017-09-21