Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4581 - 4590 of 63640 for records/1000.
Search results 4581 - 4590 of 63640 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Robert R. Shaffer
to the no merit report and has elected not to respond. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11137 - 2017-09-19
to the no merit report and has elected not to respond. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11137 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert R. Shaffer
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11137 - 2005-03-31
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11137 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907070 - 2025-01-29
report. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907070 - 2025-01-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the harassment injunction. Based upon a No. 2024AP1299 2 review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=957766 - 2025-05-20
the harassment injunction. Based upon a No. 2024AP1299 2 review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=957766 - 2025-05-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104963 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104963 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159570 - 2017-09-21
to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159570 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the harassment injunction. Based upon a No. 2024AP1299 2 review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=957766 - 2025-05-20
the harassment injunction. Based upon a No. 2024AP1299 2 review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=957766 - 2025-05-20
[PDF]
Timothy Oddsen v. City of Milwaukee
, there is nothing in the record to establish that he would have elected the PSO or, if he had, which payment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12845 - 2017-09-21
, there is nothing in the record to establish that he would have elected the PSO or, if he had, which payment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12845 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report, the response, and the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206755 - 2018-01-05
of the no-merit report, the response, and the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206755 - 2018-01-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201647 - 2017-11-07
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201647 - 2017-11-07