Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45801 - 45810 of 84303 for case number.
Search results 45801 - 45810 of 84303 for case number.
[PDF]
State v. Debra J. Findlay
interprets these cases to mean “exigency isn’t determined by the nature of the offense being investigated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2841 - 2017-09-19
interprets these cases to mean “exigency isn’t determined by the nature of the offense being investigated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2841 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865811 - 2024-10-22
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865811 - 2024-10-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that this case is moot, and we dismiss the appeal. BACKGROUND ¶2 On April 28, 2023
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953495 - 2025-05-13
conclude that this case is moot, and we dismiss the appeal. BACKGROUND ¶2 On April 28, 2023
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953495 - 2025-05-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
duplicates untainted evidence, the relative strength and weakness of the State’s case and the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89347 - 2014-09-15
duplicates untainted evidence, the relative strength and weakness of the State’s case and the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89347 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Lori L. Fleig v. Patrick A. Fleig
of this case. We therefore conclude that the trial court properly exercised its discretion. ¶7 Lori argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2808 - 2017-09-19
of this case. We therefore conclude that the trial court properly exercised its discretion. ¶7 Lori argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2808 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction erroneously indicates that two counts charged in this case were dismissed as read-ins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183691 - 2017-09-21
of conviction erroneously indicates that two counts charged in this case were dismissed as read-ins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183691 - 2017-09-21
Sandra Kube v. Thomas A. Pietruszka
properly exercised its discretion, we affirm. This case arises from a dispute over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14917 - 2005-03-31
properly exercised its discretion, we affirm. This case arises from a dispute over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14917 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157112 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157112 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard L. Bignell
of the certification requirements of Wis. Stat. § 343.305(6)(b)3, to the facts of this case, a question of law which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2407 - 2005-03-31
of the certification requirements of Wis. Stat. § 343.305(6)(b)3, to the facts of this case, a question of law which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2407 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, but did find a Sawyer County case pending against Earhart that had a no-contact bond provision regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53086 - 2010-08-09
, but did find a Sawyer County case pending against Earhart that had a no-contact bond provision regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53086 - 2010-08-09