Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45811 - 45820 of 84303 for case number.
Search results 45811 - 45820 of 84303 for case number.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=826568 - 2024-07-17
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=826568 - 2024-07-17
[PDF]
State v. Shawn C. Picotte
in Swanson supports Picotte's argument in this case. However, Swanson has been limited in its application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10323 - 2017-09-20
in Swanson supports Picotte's argument in this case. However, Swanson has been limited in its application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10323 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Unaware of the prior conviction in North Dakota, Pierce County charged the case as a civil forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26883 - 2014-09-15
. Unaware of the prior conviction in North Dakota, Pierce County charged the case as a civil forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26883 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Korotka
of weaknesses in the State’s case, Korotka cites the prosecutor’s statement at a pretrial hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15589 - 2017-09-21
of weaknesses in the State’s case, Korotka cites the prosecutor’s statement at a pretrial hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15589 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=826568 - 2024-07-17
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=826568 - 2024-07-17
Arlo M. Tratz v. Judy P. Smith
filed a second unitemized request for $15, “for the expenses he incurred during this case.” On November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31
filed a second unitemized request for $15, “for the expenses he incurred during this case.” On November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31
State v. Susan Triggs
for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The case was tried to a six-person jury, pursuant to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16024 - 2005-03-31
for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The case was tried to a six-person jury, pursuant to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16024 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dwayne O. Jackson
Case No. 99-CF-196. ¶3 On March 22, 2000, Jackson pled no contest to the charge of having sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3333 - 2017-09-19
Case No. 99-CF-196. ¶3 On March 22, 2000, Jackson pled no contest to the charge of having sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3333 - 2017-09-19
State v. Antoinette Kennedy
not guilty and the case was set for a jury trial. On March 26, 2001, the date the trial was supposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4705 - 2005-03-31
not guilty and the case was set for a jury trial. On March 26, 2001, the date the trial was supposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4705 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nate Wilson
sentencing in a drug case.[2] We affirm the order. ¶2 Wilson was convicted as a repeat offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4036 - 2005-03-31
sentencing in a drug case.[2] We affirm the order. ¶2 Wilson was convicted as a repeat offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4036 - 2005-03-31