Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45821 - 45830 of 84318 for case number.
Search results 45821 - 45830 of 84318 for case number.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that this case is moot, and we dismiss the appeal. BACKGROUND ¶2 On April 28, 2023
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953495 - 2025-05-13
conclude that this case is moot, and we dismiss the appeal. BACKGROUND ¶2 On April 28, 2023
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953495 - 2025-05-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings. ¶2 This case arises from the sale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243443 - 2019-07-17
, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings. ¶2 This case arises from the sale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243443 - 2019-07-17
[PDF]
State v. Harlan L. Horswill
in this case. The court observed that Horswill’s defense in this case was that the touchings may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12071 - 2017-09-21
in this case. The court observed that Horswill’s defense in this case was that the touchings may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12071 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
by the State involves an application of the facts of this case to the law announced in State v. Newer, 2007 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36570 - 2009-05-26
by the State involves an application of the facts of this case to the law announced in State v. Newer, 2007 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36570 - 2009-05-26
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 24, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
the case as a civil forfeiture, first offense. On February 21, 1997, Shulka was convicted in Pierce County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26883 - 2006-10-23
the case as a civil forfeiture, first offense. On February 21, 1997, Shulka was convicted in Pierce County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26883 - 2006-10-23
COURT OF APPEALS
on this case. ¶2 On appeal, the State admits that “[t]his court can assume Branch was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143694 - 2015-06-30
on this case. ¶2 On appeal, the State admits that “[t]his court can assume Branch was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143694 - 2015-06-30
[PDF]
State v. Terry A. Givens
. She claims the trial court erred in denying her motion made at the close of the State's case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11264 - 2017-09-19
. She claims the trial court erred in denying her motion made at the close of the State's case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11264 - 2017-09-19
Sandra Kube v. Thomas A. Pietruszka
properly exercised its discretion, we affirm. This case arises from a dispute over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14917 - 2005-03-31
properly exercised its discretion, we affirm. This case arises from a dispute over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14917 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Consent (or cooperation) is not a defense to statutory rape; when we use that terminology in this case we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28076 - 2014-09-15
Consent (or cooperation) is not a defense to statutory rape; when we use that terminology in this case we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28076 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Korotka
of weaknesses in the State’s case, Korotka cites the prosecutor’s statement at a pretrial hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15589 - 2017-09-21
of weaknesses in the State’s case, Korotka cites the prosecutor’s statement at a pretrial hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15589 - 2017-09-21