Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45841 - 45850 of 64132 for records.
Search results 45841 - 45850 of 64132 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
of the statutes throughout the opinion. [2] The record does not indicate what sentences were imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28489 - 2007-03-19
of the statutes throughout the opinion. [2] The record does not indicate what sentences were imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28489 - 2007-03-19
Lorenza D. Thompson v. Lennore Biggers Thompson
not think the parties were married. This finding is not "clearly erroneous." Rather, the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7874 - 2005-03-31
not think the parties were married. This finding is not "clearly erroneous." Rather, the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7874 - 2005-03-31
State v. Reginald E. Sims
. The circuit court denied both motions on May 10, 2004, and Sims appeals. ¶5 The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7545 - 2005-03-31
. The circuit court denied both motions on May 10, 2004, and Sims appeals. ¶5 The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7545 - 2005-03-31
State v. Reginald E. Sims
. The circuit court denied both motions on May 10, 2004, and Sims appeals. ¶5 The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7544 - 2005-03-31
. The circuit court denied both motions on May 10, 2004, and Sims appeals. ¶5 The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7544 - 2005-03-31
State v. John N. McCoy
explain the elements to McCoy. Although the plea questionnaire is not of record, the trial court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8945 - 2005-03-31
explain the elements to McCoy. Although the plea questionnaire is not of record, the trial court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8945 - 2005-03-31
Karl Melnik v. Matthew Mikolic
is not clearly erroneous. See Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2). ¶4 The record also supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6908 - 2005-03-31
is not clearly erroneous. See Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2). ¶4 The record also supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6908 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
] motion for sentence credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102302 - 2013-10-01
] motion for sentence credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102302 - 2013-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS
to the court based solely upon portions of the record from the first trial. The court awarded Sarah $5,460. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47552 - 2010-03-01
to the court based solely upon portions of the record from the first trial. The court awarded Sarah $5,460. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47552 - 2010-03-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
authority or citation to the facts of record. We will not consider arguments that are inadequately
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201419 - 2017-11-03
authority or citation to the facts of record. We will not consider arguments that are inadequately
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201419 - 2017-11-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
affirmed, concluding that “[t]here [wa]s ample evidence in the record to support the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29961 - 2014-09-15
affirmed, concluding that “[t]here [wa]s ample evidence in the record to support the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29961 - 2014-09-15