Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45851 - 45860 of 64743 for b's.
Search results 45851 - 45860 of 64743 for b's.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379740 - 2021-06-22
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379740 - 2021-06-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5. AppealNo AddtlCap Panel2 2014-09-15T18:35:24-0500 CCAP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98457 - 2014-09-15
. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5. AppealNo AddtlCap Panel2 2014-09-15T18:35:24-0500 CCAP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98457 - 2014-09-15
State v. Gary Cembrowski
Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] The Honorable Stanley A. Miller presided over the plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12111 - 2005-03-31
Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] The Honorable Stanley A. Miller presided over the plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12111 - 2005-03-31
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
. 02-20-2013 Affirmed 2012AP002027 State v. Ricky B
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95260 - 2013-04-07
. 02-20-2013 Affirmed 2012AP002027 State v. Ricky B
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95260 - 2013-04-07
[PDF]
WI APP 236
would be in violation of WIS. STAT. § 343.44(1)(b) (forbidding operating after revocation). The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30520 - 2014-09-15
would be in violation of WIS. STAT. § 343.44(1)(b) (forbidding operating after revocation). The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30520 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey S. Love
and order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See RULE 809.23(1)(b)4, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13916 - 2014-09-15
and order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See RULE 809.23(1)(b)4, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13916 - 2014-09-15
State v. Thomas J. Fleck
)(b)5, Stats. [1] In his reply brief, Fleck states that the evidence did not establish that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8674 - 2005-03-31
)(b)5, Stats. [1] In his reply brief, Fleck states that the evidence did not establish that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8674 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Sommer
” ). B. INACCURATE INFORMATION Sommer also argues that resentencing is required because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8156 - 2017-09-19
” ). B. INACCURATE INFORMATION Sommer also argues that resentencing is required because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8156 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94977 - 2014-09-15
. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94977 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Scott A. Unertl
.—Judgment affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21440 - 2017-09-21
.—Judgment affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21440 - 2017-09-21