Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45881 - 45890 of 84312 for case number.
Search results 45881 - 45890 of 84312 for case number.
Wendy Enright v. Pleasant View Ltd. Partnerships
. ¶1 ANDERSON, J.[1] In a previous case before this court, we decided that Wendy Enright
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16186 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 ANDERSON, J.[1] In a previous case before this court, we decided that Wendy Enright
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16186 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).2 We summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045485 - 2025-12-04
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).2 We summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045485 - 2025-12-04
State v. Kenneth Korotka
of weaknesses in the State’s case, Korotka cites the prosecutor’s statement at a pretrial hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15589 - 2005-03-31
of weaknesses in the State’s case, Korotka cites the prosecutor’s statement at a pretrial hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15589 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=826568 - 2024-07-17
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=826568 - 2024-07-17
[PDF]
Sandra Kube v. Thomas A. Pietruszka
. This case arises from a dispute over Sandra L. Kube’s Hodunk Road property. Kube and Pietruszka entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14917 - 2017-09-21
. This case arises from a dispute over Sandra L. Kube’s Hodunk Road property. Kube and Pietruszka entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14917 - 2017-09-21
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=29&year=2007
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=29&year=2007
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=1401&year=2021
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=1401&year=2021
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=723&year=2015
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=723&year=2015
State v. Mario D. Harrell
of review when reviewing cases involving a question of law is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis. 2d 549
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5198 - 2005-03-31
of review when reviewing cases involving a question of law is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis. 2d 549
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5198 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157112 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157112 - 2017-09-21