Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4591 - 4600 of 50064 for writ of certiorari forms.
Search results 4591 - 4600 of 50064 for writ of certiorari forms.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
’ claims was via a certiorari action in Washington County Circuit Court case No. 2019CV162, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659123 - 2023-05-24
’ claims was via a certiorari action in Washington County Circuit Court case No. 2019CV162, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659123 - 2023-05-24
COURT OF APPEALS
, and Holloway next sought certiorari review in the circuit court. The circuit court affirmed in turn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57806 - 2010-12-20
, and Holloway next sought certiorari review in the circuit court. The circuit court affirmed in turn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57806 - 2010-12-20
Nova Services, Inc. v. Village of Saukville
and this appeal commenced. In an action for certiorari review, appellate review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11193 - 2005-03-31
and this appeal commenced. In an action for certiorari review, appellate review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11193 - 2005-03-31
Malcolm, Inc. v. Eau Claire County Board of Land Use Appeals
is reviewed under a certiorari standard. Wis. Stat. § 59.694(10). This court reviews the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19364 - 2005-08-22
is reviewed under a certiorari standard. Wis. Stat. § 59.694(10). This court reviews the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19364 - 2005-08-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
certiorari review in the circuit court. The circuit court affirmed in turn, and this appeal followed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57806 - 2014-09-15
certiorari review in the circuit court. The circuit court affirmed in turn, and this appeal followed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57806 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
On certiorari review, the reviewing court is limited to determining: (1) whether the Commission kept within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49112 - 2014-09-15
On certiorari review, the reviewing court is limited to determining: (1) whether the Commission kept within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49112 - 2014-09-15
Michael E. Stoetzel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
by local zoning ordinances and administrative provisions. The Stoetzels sought certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4911 - 2005-03-31
by local zoning ordinances and administrative provisions. The Stoetzels sought certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4911 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Walter G. Szymanski v. Jane Gamble
relief is not available where other adequate remedies, such as common law certiorari, exist. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2942 - 2017-09-19
relief is not available where other adequate remedies, such as common law certiorari, exist. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2942 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Michael E. Stoetzel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
and administrative provisions. The Stoetzels sought certiorari review. The circuit court reversed the board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4911 - 2017-09-19
and administrative provisions. The Stoetzels sought certiorari review. The circuit court reversed the board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4911 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Lee Knowlin v. Director
administrative determinations regarding placement and classification is by certiorari. State ex rel. Lomax v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12055 - 2017-09-21
administrative determinations regarding placement and classification is by certiorari. State ex rel. Lomax v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12055 - 2017-09-21