Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45901 - 45910 of 68397 for law.
Search results 45901 - 45910 of 68397 for law.
[PDF]
State v. Mark R. Kuhn
, an appellate court must decide questions of law independently without deference to the decision of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9692 - 2017-09-19
, an appellate court must decide questions of law independently without deference to the decision of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9692 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Ronald Waites v. Marianne Cooke
of law which we review de novo. See id. To establish prejudice, a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10516 - 2017-09-20
of law which we review de novo. See id. To establish prejudice, a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10516 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
agree. ¶8 Review of a commitment order presents a mixed question of law and fact. We uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516016 - 2022-05-03
agree. ¶8 Review of a commitment order presents a mixed question of law and fact. We uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516016 - 2022-05-03
[PDF]
State v. Susan L. Bauer
in probative value and force that it can be said as a matter of law that no trier of fact, acting reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7540 - 2017-09-19
in probative value and force that it can be said as a matter of law that no trier of fact, acting reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7540 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as the court examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law and demonstrated a rational
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87849 - 2014-09-15
as the court examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law and demonstrated a rational
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87849 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Randy A. Davis
the decision upon a mistaken view of the evidence or an erroneous view of the law. Sievert v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5835 - 2017-09-19
the decision upon a mistaken view of the evidence or an erroneous view of the law. Sievert v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5835 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. “The application of a statute to the facts of the case is a question of law that we review de novo.” Waller v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199213 - 2017-10-26
. “The application of a statute to the facts of the case is a question of law that we review de novo.” Waller v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199213 - 2017-10-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
that are looking for her and would like to have a talk with her. I’m associated with a law firm called Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56806 - 2014-09-15
that are looking for her and would like to have a talk with her. I’m associated with a law firm called Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56806 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonableness is a question of law we review de novo. Id. Similarly, whether a person has standing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96078 - 2014-09-15
of reasonableness is a question of law we review de novo. Id. Similarly, whether a person has standing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96078 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional fact is a mixed question of law and fact to which we apply a two-step standard of review. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196751 - 2017-10-02
of constitutional fact is a mixed question of law and fact to which we apply a two-step standard of review. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196751 - 2017-10-02