Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45971 - 45980 of 64132 for records.

State v. Jamal R. Jackson
.” The court also noted that Jackson had a previous juvenile record, and that he was likely to continue his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12772 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] 01-07 Amendment of SCR Ch. 35 relating to eligibility for appointment as guardian ad litem (Effective 07-01-03)
) The appointing court has made a finding in writing or on the record that the action or proceeding presents
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970 - 2017-09-20

Colleen Lundberg v. North Medical Transportation
or proprietary powers. The record contains no evidence that the department owns the equipment or buildings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9420 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Kenneth Neu
4 ¶6 Moreover, nothing in the record supports Neu’s claim that he took the stand as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16044 - 2017-09-21

State v. James R. Sanders
objection to the prosecutor’s recommendation at the sentencing hearing. The record as a whole suggests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3784 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] County of Crawford v. Jeffery A. Welsh
is adequately supported by the record and he has not No. 95-1242 -2- argued that without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9017 - 2017-09-19

Mark J. Santner v. Debbie Mitchell
the actual sentencing date is not in the record, it is clear that sometime after February of 2000, Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7195 - 2005-03-31

State v. Terry C. Kazee
the trial court denied Kazee’s motion without a hearing, the record on appeal is not fully developed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3389 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that there are three new factors warranting sentence modification. After reviewing the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=803107 - 2024-05-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
’ concealed weapon. Because the court’s findings are not clearly erroneous, the record provides no factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84039 - 2014-09-15