Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 461 - 470 of 839 for holt.
Search results 461 - 470 of 839 for holt.
[PDF]
NOTICE
Holt v. State, 17 Wis. 2d 468, 480, 117 N.W.2d 626 (1962). The reason for the rule is set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37084 - 2014-09-15
Holt v. State, 17 Wis. 2d 468, 480, 117 N.W.2d 626 (1962). The reason for the rule is set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37084 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of the defendant’s confession that the crime in fact occurred. See Holt v. State, 17 Wis. 2d 468, 480, 117 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37084 - 2009-07-06
of the defendant’s confession that the crime in fact occurred. See Holt v. State, 17 Wis. 2d 468, 480, 117 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37084 - 2009-07-06
CA Blank Order
. Zales Zales Law Office 9012 W. Holt. Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53227-4426 Tracy Lionall Granberry #285709
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144168 - 2015-07-05
. Zales Zales Law Office 9012 W. Holt. Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53227-4426 Tracy Lionall Granberry #285709
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144168 - 2015-07-05
COURT OF APPEALS
that Love’s claims are procedurally barred. We agree and affirm on this ground. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30554 - 2007-10-09
that Love’s claims are procedurally barred. We agree and affirm on this ground. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30554 - 2007-10-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
no reason at all, or if the reasoning was not presented to the lower court. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228624 - 2018-11-27
no reason at all, or if the reasoning was not presented to the lower court. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228624 - 2018-11-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a lower court’s holding on a theory or reasoning not presented to the lower court. See State v. Holt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243054 - 2019-07-02
a lower court’s holding on a theory or reasoning not presented to the lower court. See State v. Holt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243054 - 2019-07-02
[PDF]
Clara M. Rolland v. County of Milwaukee
’ motion for summary judgment, we do so for a different reason. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15771 - 2017-09-21
’ motion for summary judgment, we do so for a different reason. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15771 - 2017-09-21
Clara M. Rolland v. County of Milwaukee
for a different reason. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124–125, 382 N.W.2d 679, 687 (Ct. App. 1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15771 - 2005-03-31
for a different reason. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124–125, 382 N.W.2d 679, 687 (Ct. App. 1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15771 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Daniel Otte v. Yvonne Otte
to whether the circuit court misused its discretion. Weston v. Holt, 157 Wis. 2d 595, 602, 460 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3597 - 2017-09-19
to whether the circuit court misused its discretion. Weston v. Holt, 157 Wis. 2d 595, 602, 460 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3597 - 2017-09-19
State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
. 1989) (cases should be decided on the “narrowest possible ground”); State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5543 - 2005-03-31
. 1989) (cases should be decided on the “narrowest possible ground”); State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5543 - 2005-03-31