Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 461 - 470 of 57152 for id.
Search results 461 - 470 of 57152 for id.
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the defendant’s criminal conduct considered at sentencing. Id. Although the amount of restitution ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59541 - 2014-09-15
to the defendant’s criminal conduct considered at sentencing. Id. Although the amount of restitution ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59541 - 2014-09-15
State v. Joseph D. Minkin
to by the defendant at arraignment Id. at 900. ¶6 The court further commented that prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6445 - 2005-03-31
to by the defendant at arraignment Id. at 900. ¶6 The court further commented that prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6445 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gerald D. Barr
but independently apply the facts to the constitutional standard. Id. However, because the underlying facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6566 - 2017-09-19
but independently apply the facts to the constitutional standard. Id. However, because the underlying facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6566 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circumstances test. Id. “The approach we accept is a balancing test, in which the conduct of both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196833 - 2017-09-26
of the circumstances test. Id. “The approach we accept is a balancing test, in which the conduct of both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196833 - 2017-09-26
State v. Sean W. Ottman
for interpreting the statute as excluding custody as a condition of probation from the statute’s coverage.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15975 - 2005-03-31
for interpreting the statute as excluding custody as a condition of probation from the statute’s coverage.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15975 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 29
of constitutional fact, this court engages in a two-part inquiry. Id. First, we review the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357950 - 2021-06-14
of constitutional fact, this court engages in a two-part inquiry. Id. First, we review the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357950 - 2021-06-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a felony.” Id. ¶7 As the basis for the domestic abuse repeater enhancer in this case, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048314 - 2025-12-09
to a felony.” Id. ¶7 As the basis for the domestic abuse repeater enhancer in this case, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048314 - 2025-12-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
property belonged to the homeowners—her parents—rather than to the Trust. Id., ¶1. Lindemann also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192292 - 2017-09-21
property belonged to the homeowners—her parents—rather than to the Trust. Id., ¶1. Lindemann also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192292 - 2017-09-21
Heier's Trucking, Inc. v. Waupaca County
). The burden of proving that an enactment is unconstitutional is on the party challenging the enactment. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11903 - 2005-03-31
). The burden of proving that an enactment is unconstitutional is on the party challenging the enactment. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11903 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 68
. Id., ¶3. Here, plaintiff Roger H. Fischer’s insurer paid $10,000 (the policy limit) of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49371 - 2014-09-15
. Id., ¶3. Here, plaintiff Roger H. Fischer’s insurer paid $10,000 (the policy limit) of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49371 - 2014-09-15