Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 461 - 470 of 1808 for indigency.

[PDF] Comments on Supreme Court rule petition 17-06 - Paul Swanson
in the proposition that, in order to provide competent representation to indigent criminal defendants, compensation
/supreme/docs/1706commentsswanson.pdf - 2018-04-04

[PDF] Supreme Court rule petition 15-06
ended all state funding for indigent civil legal services. 5. In 2013, WATJ coordinated
/supreme/docs/1506petition.pdf - 2015-10-12

[PDF] Supreme Court Rules petition 10-08 comment - WEJF
to provide legal representation to indigent litigants facing the loss of Wisconsin Supreme Court
/supreme/docs/1008commentequaljustice.pdf - 2011-09-13

[PDF] NOTICE
In January 2010, Brophy filed a motion in municipal court requesting an indigency hearing to address his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61920 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
in municipal court requesting an indigency hearing to address his payment of the forfeitures imposed in each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61920 - 2011-03-28

[PDF] Arthur D. Dyer v. Rosemarie Annonson
in light of her indigence. She further argues that the trial court erred both in its rulings regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8967 - 2017-09-19

Arthur D. Dyer v. Rosemarie Annonson
and to direct the subpoena of witnesses in light of her indigence. She further argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8967 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Kenneth C. Luedke
, in accordance with s. 970.02 (6), may refer the person to the authority for indigency determinations specified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10706 - 2017-09-20

State v. Kenneth C. Luedke
commissioner, in accordance with s. 970.02 (6), may refer the person to the authority for indigency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10706 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ervin J. Seidl
indigent and he was financially unable to pay the fine. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14654 - 2005-03-31