Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 461 - 470 of 9295 for jurors.

State v. Frances Nienhardt
. Nienhardt argues that the trial court erred when it failed to strike a prospective juror for cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8285 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
jurors dissenting. The jury awarded Greenfield approximately $8 million. The defendants filed post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31007 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Frances Nienhardt
it failed to strike a prospective juror for cause and failed to grant a mistrial after the juror revealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8285 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by the possible presence of a biased juror; prosecutorial misconduct; and multiple instances of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80031 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 27, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appe...
rights were violated by the possible presence of a biased juror; prosecutorial misconduct; and multiple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80031 - 2012-03-26

[PDF] State v. Timmy J. Reichling
and impartial jurors; (5) his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to ask critical questions of jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7957 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] In Re the Matter of the Final Report of the Wisconsin Courts Covid-19 Task Force
the health and safety of jurors, litigants, attorneys, victims, witnesses, judges, court staff
/news/docs/taskforcefinalreport.pdf - 2020-05-22

[PDF] State v. David J. Wolfe
for failing to move to strike for cause two prospective jurors on the grounds of objective bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2832 - 2017-09-19

State v. David J. Wolfe
. § 980.02(2)(ag) (1999-2000);[1] for failing to move to strike for cause two prospective jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15882 - 2005-03-31

State v. David J. Wolfe
. § 980.02(2)(ag) (1999-2000);[1] for failing to move to strike for cause two prospective jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2832 - 2005-03-31