Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 461 - 470 of 85035 for ninth judicial district.

[PDF] Honey Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District v. Robert G. Langley
STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8323 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Wisconsin Judicial Commission v. Lawrence F. Waddick
in writing the chief judge of the judicial administrative district in which the matter is pending
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17447 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. Appeal No. 2011AP1828-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2009CF2096 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93295 - 2013-02-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. ALFONZO C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93295 - 2014-09-15

Raquel R. S. and K.B. v. Necedah Area School District
. Appeal No. 02-0703 Cir. Ct. No. 99-CV-70 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5037 - 2005-03-31

Arthur T. Donaldson v. Board of Commissioners of Rock-Koshkonong Lake District
§ 33.33(3). Accordingly, a lake district board's detachment decision is presumed correct, and judicial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16579 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Arthur T. Donaldson v. Board of Commissioners of Rock-Koshkonong Lake District
decision is presumed correct, and judicial review is limited to inquiring (1) whether the lake district
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16579 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
District I October 11, 2013 To: Hon. Jeffrey A. Wagner Milwaukee County Circuit Court 901 N. 9th
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103068 - 2013-10-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Facsimile (608) 267-0640 Web Site: www.wicourts.gov DISTRICT III September 20, 2016
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174937 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Brew City Redevelopment Group, LLC v. The Ferchill Group
. Ninth Claim: Punitive Damages, Against All of the Defendants. ¶22 With the exception of Brew City’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21368 - 2017-09-21