Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 461 - 470 of 2406 for nys.
Search results 461 - 470 of 2406 for nys.
State v. Emmanuel Pettis
to disregard the police officer’s answer. “[A]ny prejudicial effect that might have flowed from the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5738 - 2005-03-31
to disregard the police officer’s answer. “[A]ny prejudicial effect that might have flowed from the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5738 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott T. Grabowski
for the benefit of “a[ny] crime considered at sentencing.” Wis. Stat. § 973.20(1r). A “‘[c]rime considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6449 - 2005-03-31
for the benefit of “a[ny] crime considered at sentencing.” Wis. Stat. § 973.20(1r). A “‘[c]rime considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6449 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
[] captured” anything observed in the vehicle by Officer Abel and that “[a]ny suggestion that the video
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366652 - 2021-05-13
[] captured” anything observed in the vehicle by Officer Abel and that “[a]ny suggestion that the video
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366652 - 2021-05-13
COURT OF APPEALS
determinations, and “[a]ny conflicts or contradictions in the testimony are exclusively for the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98249 - 2013-06-18
determinations, and “[a]ny conflicts or contradictions in the testimony are exclusively for the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98249 - 2013-06-18
City of Two Rivers v. Thomas J. Lavey
by the ordinance as “[a]ny sign identifying or advertising a business, person, activity, goods, products
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7925 - 2005-03-31
by the ordinance as “[a]ny sign identifying or advertising a business, person, activity, goods, products
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7925 - 2005-03-31
State v. John A. Clements
discretionary powers and permits a motion for reconsideration upon a showing of ‘[a]ny other reason[] justifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2734 - 2005-03-31
discretionary powers and permits a motion for reconsideration upon a showing of ‘[a]ny other reason[] justifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2734 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Steven J. Bohr v. Connie R. Bohr
., 122 Wis.2d at 542, 363 N.W.2d at 422. Section 806.07(1)(h), STATS., permits relief for “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10792 - 2017-09-20
., 122 Wis.2d at 542, 363 N.W.2d at 422. Section 806.07(1)(h), STATS., permits relief for “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10792 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Angela M. McEvoy v. Group Health Cooperative of Eau Claire
. According to the relevant statute, "[A]ny patient or the patient's representative having a claim or any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10616 - 2017-09-20
. According to the relevant statute, "[A]ny patient or the patient's representative having a claim or any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10616 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” because “[a]ny rehabilitation must take place within the confinement of incarceration.” ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123855 - 2017-09-21
” because “[a]ny rehabilitation must take place within the confinement of incarceration.” ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123855 - 2017-09-21
State v. Brian K. Rice
pronouncement controls[,]” and “[a]ny sentence pronounced orally and recorded in the sentencing transcripts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6423 - 2005-03-31
pronouncement controls[,]” and “[a]ny sentence pronounced orally and recorded in the sentencing transcripts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6423 - 2005-03-31