Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 461 - 470 of 59649 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 461 - 470 of 59649 for quit claim deed/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that, because the court found the actual location of the government lot line, his deed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94499 - 2013-03-25
argues that, because the court found the actual location of the government lot line, his deed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94499 - 2013-03-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the court found the actual location of the government lot line, his deed was rendered unambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94499 - 2014-09-15
the court found the actual location of the government lot line, his deed was rendered unambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94499 - 2014-09-15
Mark C. Treter v. James J. Valona
fraud, and unjust enrichment. It claimed, as material, that the consideration for the quitclaim deed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19968 - 2005-10-17
fraud, and unjust enrichment. It claimed, as material, that the consideration for the quitclaim deed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19968 - 2005-10-17
[PDF]
Mark C. Treter v. James J. Valona
evicted. He tried to get the National- Avenue property back by claiming that Valona got the deed from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19968 - 2017-09-21
evicted. He tried to get the National- Avenue property back by claiming that Valona got the deed from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19968 - 2017-09-21
Jack J. Hargrove v.
in January, 1994, to draft two deeds, for which he paid $120 for the attorney’s services and the recording
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17091 - 2005-03-31
in January, 1994, to draft two deeds, for which he paid $120 for the attorney’s services and the recording
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17091 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
claim. The circuit court granted summary judgment, concluding that, as a matter of law, Wagner’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43919 - 2009-11-24
claim. The circuit court granted summary judgment, concluding that, as a matter of law, Wagner’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43919 - 2009-11-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
claim. The circuit court granted summary judgment, concluding that, as a matter of law, Wagner’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43919 - 2014-09-15
claim. The circuit court granted summary judgment, concluding that, as a matter of law, Wagner’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43919 - 2014-09-15
Dwight Zietlow v. David Stokes
. VERGERONT, J.[1] Dwight and Rachel Zietlow appeal from an order requiring that they deed to David and Ann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8570 - 2005-03-31
. VERGERONT, J.[1] Dwight and Rachel Zietlow appeal from an order requiring that they deed to David and Ann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8570 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dwight Zietlow v. David Stokes
. VERGERONT, J.1 Dwight and Rachel Zietlow appeal from an order requiring that they deed to David and Ann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8570 - 2017-09-19
. VERGERONT, J.1 Dwight and Rachel Zietlow appeal from an order requiring that they deed to David and Ann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8570 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, they argue that the court should have addressed their claim for a prescriptive easement. ¶2 We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865423 - 2024-10-22
, they argue that the court should have addressed their claim for a prescriptive easement. ¶2 We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865423 - 2024-10-22