Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4601 - 4610 of 40299 for Antique 💥🏹 antiquewolrd.com 💥🏹 antique news 💥🏹 clean antique 💥🏹 antique brass 💥🏹 antiqueworld.
Search results 4601 - 4610 of 40299 for Antique 💥🏹 antiquewolrd.com 💥🏹 antique news 💥🏹 clean antique 💥🏹 antique brass 💥🏹 antiqueworld.
State v. Nicholas D. Dekker
-degree sexual assault and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial or sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14293 - 2005-03-31
-degree sexual assault and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial or sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14293 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert Anthony Joshua
from an order denying a motion to modify sentence premised upon a new factor. Because we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18454 - 2017-09-21
from an order denying a motion to modify sentence premised upon a new factor. Because we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18454 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert Anthony Joshua
premised upon a new factor. Because we agree with the circuit court that no new factor exists, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18454 - 2005-06-06
premised upon a new factor. Because we agree with the circuit court that no new factor exists, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18454 - 2005-06-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
modification, alleging that the trial court’s failure to consider the sentencing guidelines constituted a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31847 - 2014-09-15
modification, alleging that the trial court’s failure to consider the sentencing guidelines constituted a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31847 - 2014-09-15
State v. Paul L. Eickert
that a witness’ change in testimony is a new factor in light of which the court should modify his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13735 - 2005-03-31
that a witness’ change in testimony is a new factor in light of which the court should modify his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13735 - 2005-03-31
State v. James R. Brownson
his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11911 - 2005-03-31
his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11911 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
endangering safety. In 2013, Venzant sought sentence modification due to a new factor. Venzant argued that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108688 - 2014-03-11
endangering safety. In 2013, Venzant sought sentence modification due to a new factor. Venzant argued that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108688 - 2014-03-11
[PDF]
State v. Paul L. Eickert
sentence. Eickert claims that a witness’ change in testimony is a new factor in light of which the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13735 - 2014-09-15
sentence. Eickert claims that a witness’ change in testimony is a new factor in light of which the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13735 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
challenge to the DNA surcharge decided the matter, and that Cherry does not constitute a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44835 - 2014-09-15
challenge to the DNA surcharge decided the matter, and that Cherry does not constitute a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44835 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the previously-imposed sentence of Rogers’ codefendant was not a new factor warranting sentence modification
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191973 - 2017-09-21
that the previously-imposed sentence of Rogers’ codefendant was not a new factor warranting sentence modification
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191973 - 2017-09-21