Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4601 - 4610 of 20925 for word.
Search results 4601 - 4610 of 20925 for word.
Betty Butler v. AAA Life Insurance Company
because it failed to use the word “misrepresentation” in its pleading. See Norwest Bank Wisconsin Eau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14764 - 2005-03-31
because it failed to use the word “misrepresentation” in its pleading. See Norwest Bank Wisconsin Eau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14764 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
reject the State's argument that we should construe the word “shall” in § 971.04(1), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8098 - 2017-09-19
reject the State's argument that we should construe the word “shall” in § 971.04(1), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8098 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, ‘not hypothetical facts in other situations.’” Id., ¶24 (citation omitted). In other words, the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247838 - 2019-10-01
, ‘not hypothetical facts in other situations.’” Id., ¶24 (citation omitted). In other words, the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247838 - 2019-10-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the words “other acts evidence.” This argument fails. By objecting, Sholar’s trial counsel preserved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143716 - 2017-09-21
the words “other acts evidence.” This argument fails. By objecting, Sholar’s trial counsel preserved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143716 - 2017-09-21
2009 WI APP 51
words are given their technical or special definitions. State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35716 - 2009-05-11
words are given their technical or special definitions. State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35716 - 2009-05-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the common and ordinary meaning of [the] word.” Garcia v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc., 2004 WI 93, ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841115 - 2024-09-10
the common and ordinary meaning of [the] word.” Garcia v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc., 2004 WI 93, ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841115 - 2024-09-10
David M. Bliss v. Wisconsin Retirement Board
is unreasonable if it directly contravenes the words of the statute, it is clearly contrary to legislative intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12583 - 2005-03-31
is unreasonable if it directly contravenes the words of the statute, it is clearly contrary to legislative intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12583 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 38
its plain meaning. See id., ¶¶44-45. We give words and phrases their common, ordinary, and accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31825 - 2008-03-18
its plain meaning. See id., ¶¶44-45. We give words and phrases their common, ordinary, and accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31825 - 2008-03-18
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Thiel
be adjudged sexually violent. The words of the statutes clearly and unambiguously set forth the State's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17478 - 2017-09-21
be adjudged sexually violent. The words of the statutes clearly and unambiguously set forth the State's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17478 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
basis. It is well-established that Wisconsin courts cannot “disregard the plain, clear words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677505 - 2023-07-11
basis. It is well-established that Wisconsin courts cannot “disregard the plain, clear words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677505 - 2023-07-11