Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46011 - 46020 of 68466 for did.
Search results 46011 - 46020 of 68466 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a postconviction motion for plea withdrawal alleging that she did not understand the plea offer. She claimed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725984 - 2023-11-07
a postconviction motion for plea withdrawal alleging that she did not understand the plea offer. She claimed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725984 - 2023-11-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
raised…. Merely acknowledging the ‘clearly stronger’ standard, as [Tatum] did in his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883872 - 2024-12-03
raised…. Merely acknowledging the ‘clearly stronger’ standard, as [Tatum] did in his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883872 - 2024-12-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
probability of physical harm to [him]self or others.” The commissioner did not expressly find that A.D.S.Z
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209884 - 2018-03-15
probability of physical harm to [him]self or others.” The commissioner did not expressly find that A.D.S.Z
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209884 - 2018-03-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
found that the charged counts were not multiplicitous and did not violate Defoe’s double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=950146 - 2025-04-30
found that the charged counts were not multiplicitous and did not violate Defoe’s double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=950146 - 2025-04-30
[PDF]
State v. Ricky L. Sweeney
attention to his previous waiver because it did not argue waiver in the trial court. That argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13821 - 2014-09-15
attention to his previous waiver because it did not argue waiver in the trial court. That argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13821 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James Terry II
to prove a person’s bad character. WIS. STAT. § 904.04(2) (1997- 98).1 In this case the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2374 - 2017-09-19
to prove a person’s bad character. WIS. STAT. § 904.04(2) (1997- 98).1 In this case the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2374 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
No. 2013AP2731 3 as harassment with respect to those officers. She did not believe Lisney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135025 - 2017-09-21
No. 2013AP2731 3 as harassment with respect to those officers. She did not believe Lisney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135025 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kay H. Dawson
to WIS. STAT. § 346.57(5). It is undisputed that the traffic signs did not comply with the manual’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3378 - 2017-09-19
to WIS. STAT. § 346.57(5). It is undisputed that the traffic signs did not comply with the manual’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3378 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
because he had to go to work, the tenant did not place any limitation on the scope of his consent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95174 - 2013-04-04
because he had to go to work, the tenant did not place any limitation on the scope of his consent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95174 - 2013-04-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, regardless of whether the court should have admitted Gantz pro hac vice, the fact remains that it did so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167681 - 2017-09-21
, regardless of whether the court should have admitted Gantz pro hac vice, the fact remains that it did so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=167681 - 2017-09-21