Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46011 - 46020 of 68485 for did.

[PDF] Disposition table - March 2020
National Association Ziegler and Hagedorn, JJ., did not participate. 03/17/2020 2018AP669
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593446 - 2022-11-21

[PDF] Monthly Statistical Report - May 2017
A.W. Bradley, J. and Ziegler, J. did not participate. 05/18/2017 2016AP2452-D OLR v. John R
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191830 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
raised…. Merely acknowledging the ‘clearly stronger’ standard, as [Tatum] did in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883872 - 2024-12-03

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
barred because Wisniewski did not satisfactorily explain why he could not have identified those issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27385 - 2006-12-11

State v. Jane M. Roney
. There was no physical pressure placed on Roney. Although Van Rooy told Roney that he did not think she stole the money
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9071 - 2005-03-31

County of Winnebago v. Ralph Wachtveitl
to dismiss based upon his claim that Tedlie did not have probable cause to arrest him. He also claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8838 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
recommendation. Myers has not made, nor could he reasonably support, an argument that he did not know the final
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243326 - 2019-07-03

[PDF] Supreme Court Statistics August 2025
for 18 months. JILL J. KAROFSKY, C.J., and SUSAN M. CRAWFORD, J., did not participate. 08/14
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011160 - 2025-09-15

State v. Xhevat Tahiri
.” Tahiri never obtained an extension of the sixty-day deadline. Nor did he file the brief until September
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11704 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was not an insured under Puerling’s policy. The court further determined that Puerling’s act did not qualify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144842 - 2017-09-21