Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46011 - 46020 of 83961 for simple case search.
Search results 46011 - 46020 of 83961 for simple case search.
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93566 - 2013-03-05
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93566 - 2013-03-05
State v. Robert J. Barnes
in the preconviction treatment program. Based upon the record in this case, we do not dispute that Barnes’ failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13395 - 2005-03-31
in the preconviction treatment program. Based upon the record in this case, we do not dispute that Barnes’ failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13395 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott R. Nelson
N.W.2d 80. Furthermore, because this case involves a facial challenge to the statute, we do
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21617 - 2006-03-01
N.W.2d 80. Furthermore, because this case involves a facial challenge to the statute, we do
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21617 - 2006-03-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
this was in the State’s best interest and the Court accepted a plea, but it’s still a homicide case. It’s the most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33526 - 2014-09-15
this was in the State’s best interest and the Court accepted a plea, but it’s still a homicide case. It’s the most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33526 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
the circuit court that he had investigated and prepared his case in light of the time period specified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101475 - 2013-08-26
the circuit court that he had investigated and prepared his case in light of the time period specified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101475 - 2013-08-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to consider the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case. See generally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144213 - 2017-09-21
to consider the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case. See generally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144213 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
” for failing to previously raise this issue was the recent case law requiring consideration of the guidelines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51218 - 2014-09-15
” for failing to previously raise this issue was the recent case law requiring consideration of the guidelines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51218 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
him statutorily ineligible to be forcibly medicated. Michael’s argument contradicts case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107481 - 2017-09-21
him statutorily ineligible to be forcibly medicated. Michael’s argument contradicts case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107481 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Elizabeth Grissmeyer v. Spiegelhoff's Super Foods Market, Inc.
its ruling inapplicable to her case. However, the principle behind the court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15487 - 2017-09-21
its ruling inapplicable to her case. However, the principle behind the court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15487 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
3 review hearings under WIS. STAT. § 343.305(8) in cases involving persons other than herself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31751 - 2014-09-15
3 review hearings under WIS. STAT. § 343.305(8) in cases involving persons other than herself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31751 - 2014-09-15