Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46031 - 46040 of 82985 for case codes/1000.
Search results 46031 - 46040 of 82985 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the case that an order has already expired by the time the appellate court has a chance to decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277916 - 2020-08-13
the case that an order has already expired by the time the appellate court has a chance to decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277916 - 2020-08-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and presided over the trial in this case. The Honorable Kevin E. Martens entered the judgment following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305194 - 2020-11-17
, and presided over the trial in this case. The Honorable Kevin E. Martens entered the judgment following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305194 - 2020-11-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
of custody under the circumstances of Milkie’s case because Milkie was not told he was under arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30948 - 2014-09-15
of custody under the circumstances of Milkie’s case because Milkie was not told he was under arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30948 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction. Upon reviewing the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295139 - 2020-10-14
of conviction. Upon reviewing the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295139 - 2020-10-14
State v. Bradley S. Whitman
At the motion hearing, one juror testified that he was aware of the homicide case, but it was not until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5033 - 2005-03-31
At the motion hearing, one juror testified that he was aware of the homicide case, but it was not until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5033 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
This is Soto’s second appeal to this court. The facts pertinent to the procedural history of this case were set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35646 - 2009-02-23
This is Soto’s second appeal to this court. The facts pertinent to the procedural history of this case were set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35646 - 2009-02-23
2010 WI APP 49
2010 WI App 49 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP140-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46586 - 2010-05-10
2010 WI App 49 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP140-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46586 - 2010-05-10
State v. Fidencio Ruiz
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1610-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10920 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1610-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10920 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Paul L. Bathe
that the legislature intended to bar the multiple convictions at issue in this case. WISCONSIN STAT. § 939.65
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6370 - 2017-09-19
that the legislature intended to bar the multiple convictions at issue in this case. WISCONSIN STAT. § 939.65
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6370 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 150
2013 WI App 150 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2013AP310-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103832 - 2017-09-21
2013 WI App 150 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2013AP310-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103832 - 2017-09-21