Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4611 - 4620 of 15281 for 2013.
Search results 4611 - 4620 of 15281 for 2013.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
filed a no-merit report under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154654 - 2017-09-21
filed a no-merit report under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154654 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
probable cause to believe that the vehicle contains contraband. State v. Jackson, 2013 WI App 66, ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999010 - 2025-08-19
probable cause to believe that the vehicle contains contraband. State v. Jackson, 2013 WI App 66, ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999010 - 2025-08-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 974.06 (2013-14), 1 postconviction motion without a hearing. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165686 - 2017-09-21
. § 974.06 (2013-14), 1 postconviction motion without a hearing. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165686 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(e) (2013-14). All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137910 - 2017-09-21
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(e) (2013-14). All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137910 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(d) (2013-14). All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135482 - 2017-09-21
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(d) (2013-14). All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135482 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We affirm the order of the circuit court. This case arises out
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142361 - 2015-05-26
Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We affirm the order of the circuit court. This case arises out
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142361 - 2015-05-26
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 885.16 (2013-14),[1] also known as the dead man’s statute. The circuit court allowed Jo Anne to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139726 - 2015-04-14
. § 885.16 (2013-14),[1] also known as the dead man’s statute. The circuit court allowed Jo Anne to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139726 - 2015-04-14
CA Blank Order
to withdraw as appellate counsel. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141571 - 2015-05-07
to withdraw as appellate counsel. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141571 - 2015-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS
, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Missouri v. McNeely, 133 S. Ct. 1552 (2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141760 - 2015-05-13
, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Missouri v. McNeely, 133 S. Ct. 1552 (2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141760 - 2015-05-13
CA Blank Order
(2013-14).[1] We summarily affirm. Ress was convicted, after entry of no contest pleas, of possession
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147870 - 2015-08-30
(2013-14).[1] We summarily affirm. Ress was convicted, after entry of no contest pleas, of possession
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147870 - 2015-08-30