Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4611 - 4620 of 82976 for case search.
Search results 4611 - 4620 of 82976 for case search.
State v. Sharon A. Dixon
constitutional right to confront the witnesses against her; (2) her trial counsel was ineffective; (3) the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3555 - 2005-03-31
constitutional right to confront the witnesses against her; (2) her trial counsel was ineffective; (3) the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3555 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 96
that the officers in the present case could reasonably believe that a delay in procuring a search warrant would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36685 - 2014-09-15
that the officers in the present case could reasonably believe that a delay in procuring a search warrant would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36685 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 96
2009 WI App 96 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2007AP2976-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36685 - 2009-07-28
2009 WI App 96 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2007AP2976-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36685 - 2009-07-28
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2017 WI 76 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2015AP2052-CR COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192413 - 2017-09-21
2017 WI 76 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2015AP2052-CR COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192413 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment convicting him of three drug offenses.[1] He argues the affidavit in support of the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74715 - 2011-12-05
a judgment convicting him of three drug offenses.[1] He argues the affidavit in support of the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74715 - 2011-12-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. Pursuant to WIS. STAT. ยง 971.31(10) (2009-10), he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74715 - 2014-09-15
to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. Pursuant to WIS. STAT. ยง 971.31(10) (2009-10), he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74715 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Leonard L. Jones v. State
a search of his 1 This appeal is decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13259 - 2017-09-21
a search of his 1 This appeal is decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13259 - 2017-09-21
Leonard L. Jones v. State
was seized by police during a search of his person incident an arrest.[2] Jones argues that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13259 - 2005-03-31
was seized by police during a search of his person incident an arrest.[2] Jones argues that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13259 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric L. King
reasonable suspicion to temporarily detain King and that King thereafter consented to the search which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26361 - 2006-09-05
reasonable suspicion to temporarily detain King and that King thereafter consented to the search which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26361 - 2006-09-05
COURT OF APPEALS
challenging probable cause for the search warrant for his residence,[1] seeking to withdraw his no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138312 - 2015-03-31
challenging probable cause for the search warrant for his residence,[1] seeking to withdraw his no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138312 - 2015-03-31