Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4611 - 4620 of 65281 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 4611 - 4620 of 65281 for divorce records/1000.
State v. Scott Edward Ziegler
of a crime ‘unless the court finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7417 - 2005-05-09
of a crime ‘unless the court finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7417 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
State v. Scott Edward Ziegler
in the building, which was a movie theater; $1000 for a speaker and clocks; and $29,279.61 total costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7417 - 2017-09-20
in the building, which was a movie theater; $1000 for a speaker and clocks; and $29,279.61 total costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7417 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
pain and suffering; and $1000 in loss of consortium. ¶8 Both sides filed motions after verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34222 - 2008-10-07
pain and suffering; and $1000 in loss of consortium. ¶8 Both sides filed motions after verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34222 - 2008-10-07
[PDF]
State v. Sebastian C. Ransom
to deliver within 1000 feet of a park or school and obstructing an officer. Habitual offender repeater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2894 - 2017-09-19
to deliver within 1000 feet of a park or school and obstructing an officer. Habitual offender repeater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2894 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Synthia O'Grady v. Michael S. O'Grady
the record prior to certification.” Because O’Grady’s arguments fail to demonstrate error, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18370 - 2017-09-21
the record prior to certification.” Because O’Grady’s arguments fail to demonstrate error, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18370 - 2017-09-21
Synthia O'Grady v. Michael S. O'Grady
to review the record prior to certification.” Because O’Grady’s arguments fail to demonstrate error, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18370 - 2005-05-31
to review the record prior to certification.” Because O’Grady’s arguments fail to demonstrate error, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18370 - 2005-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS
addressing child support. We affirm the order. ¶2 The parties were divorced in 1993. Pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33809 - 2008-08-26
addressing child support. We affirm the order. ¶2 The parties were divorced in 1993. Pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33809 - 2008-08-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
The parties were divorced in 1993. Pursuant to a marital settlement agreement approved and incorporated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33809 - 2014-09-15
The parties were divorced in 1993. Pursuant to a marital settlement agreement approved and incorporated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33809 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
questioned Osimitz regarding Steadman and Noelle’s pending divorce as well as inconsistencies between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=824589 - 2024-07-16
questioned Osimitz regarding Steadman and Noelle’s pending divorce as well as inconsistencies between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=824589 - 2024-07-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832606 - 2024-07-30
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832606 - 2024-07-30