Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4611 - 4620 of 77048 for search which.
Search results 4611 - 4620 of 77048 for search which.
[PDF]
State v. Vito George Ambrosia
and remand the cause for further proceedings. The Walworth County Sheriff's Department executed a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10076 - 2017-09-19
and remand the cause for further proceedings. The Walworth County Sheriff's Department executed a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10076 - 2017-09-19
Wisconsin Court System - Court of Appeals opinions
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/opinions/appeals.jsp
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/opinions/appeals.jsp
State v. Max W. Ohlmann
and possession of methamphetamine. Ohlmann challenges the validity of a search used to discover most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26366 - 2006-09-05
and possession of methamphetamine. Ohlmann challenges the validity of a search used to discover most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26366 - 2006-09-05
[PDF]
State v. Max W. Ohlmann
the validity of a search used to discover most of the evidence against him. He argues that the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26366 - 2017-09-21
the validity of a search used to discover most of the evidence against him. He argues that the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26366 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
). A motion hearing was conducted, at which the parties addressed both Arndt’s refusal and his suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144547 - 2015-07-20
). A motion hearing was conducted, at which the parties addressed both Arndt’s refusal and his suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144547 - 2015-07-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). A motion hearing was conducted, at which the parties addressed both Arndt’s refusal and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144547 - 2017-09-21
omitted). A motion hearing was conducted, at which the parties addressed both Arndt’s refusal and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144547 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
granted because the stop and search were illegal. We conclude that the officers had a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80617 - 2012-04-09
granted because the stop and search were illegal. We conclude that the officers had a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80617 - 2012-04-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In 2014, probation and parole agents searched Birkholz’s property following a tip that he possessed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204657 - 2017-12-06
. In 2014, probation and parole agents searched Birkholz’s property following a tip that he possessed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204657 - 2017-12-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
have been granted because the stop and search were illegal. We conclude that the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80617 - 2014-09-15
have been granted because the stop and search were illegal. We conclude that the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80617 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
whether a warrantless search is constitutional under the community caretaker exception. Several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174103 - 2017-09-21
whether a warrantless search is constitutional under the community caretaker exception. Several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174103 - 2017-09-21