Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46101 - 46110 of 68485 for did.
Search results 46101 - 46110 of 68485 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Wesley H., Sr.
. Although Wesley H. did not object to this testimony at the time, he later, as noted, asked the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6467 - 2017-09-19
. Although Wesley H. did not object to this testimony at the time, he later, as noted, asked the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6467 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Darren M. Mueller v. Sgt. Reamer
smoked, though Mueller did not smoke. In his affidavit in support of his petition, Mueller alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15968 - 2017-09-21
smoked, though Mueller did not smoke. In his affidavit in support of his petition, Mueller alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15968 - 2017-09-21
State v. Daniel T. Winkler
instruction would have been inconsistent with Winkler’s testimony that he did not mace Nelson. The only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15277 - 2005-03-31
instruction would have been inconsistent with Winkler’s testimony that he did not mace Nelson. The only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15277 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
arguments despite the mootness of the issue at hand. However, assuming arguendo that any one of them did, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78855 - 2012-02-29
arguments despite the mootness of the issue at hand. However, assuming arguendo that any one of them did, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78855 - 2012-02-29
[PDF]
State v. Randy H. Nelson
filed a motion for postconviction relief seeking to withdraw his plea. Nelson claimed that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4944 - 2017-09-19
filed a motion for postconviction relief seeking to withdraw his plea. Nelson claimed that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4944 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Joshua would be solely and individually “responsible” for that debt, but did not require that he pay
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218336 - 2018-08-27
that Joshua would be solely and individually “responsible” for that debt, but did not require that he pay
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218336 - 2018-08-27
[PDF]
State v. Adam J. Kestell
and Scanlan asked again. Kestell responded he preferred that Scanlan did not search the vehicle. Scanlan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7627 - 2017-09-19
and Scanlan asked again. Kestell responded he preferred that Scanlan did not search the vehicle. Scanlan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7627 - 2017-09-19
State v. Walter W. Lockhart
did not object to a series of questions asked of a police officer about whether the rifle Walter had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3439 - 2005-03-31
did not object to a series of questions asked of a police officer about whether the rifle Walter had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3439 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
to be challenged when the defendant did not understand the charges, the plea process, or the future ramifications
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138236 - 2015-03-18
to be challenged when the defendant did not understand the charges, the plea process, or the future ramifications
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138236 - 2015-03-18
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
investigation report. He also had the opportunity to address the court directly, and did so prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977228 - 2025-07-02
investigation report. He also had the opportunity to address the court directly, and did so prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977228 - 2025-07-02