Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46121 - 46130 of 68502 for did.

Adam P. Read v. Susan Riseling
: Dissented: Not Participating: Abrahamson, C.J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17171 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 17, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
in the amount of $7,500 for causing the death of Larry Polonec’s hunting dog, Harold. Poach argues Polonec did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27769 - 2007-01-16

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was that Ross’s claimed new factor did not actually exist, because although the new charges were dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707798 - 2023-09-28

[PDF] State v. Damon S. Clark
the prosecutor did, in a technical sense, comply with the bargained-for recommendation by stating that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11867 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Kim A. Noordover v. John A. Noordover
overvalued the Pewaukee Lake home). The circuit court did not make an equal division of property based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18577 - 2017-09-21

Douglas Niemann v. Steve Adler
. He did not have a lease, but instead rented on a month-to-month basis. On April 2, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13281 - 2005-03-31

Lawrence H. DeClerc v. Bellin Memorial Hospital
. Petersen, 198 Wis. 222, 223 N.W. 839 (1929). We disagree. First, we note that the DeClercs did not raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14793 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey A. House
, we conclude that the inclusion of non-enumerated offenses did not render the order unlawful. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26089 - 2017-09-21

Randy Duncan v. Kenneth Gillingham
County as a defendant on the basis of its subrogation interest. The County did not answer the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11008 - 2005-03-31

State v. Brett E. Alford
for refusing to sign the written statement. Alford’s attorney did not object to the admission of evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11649 - 2005-03-31