Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46121 - 46130 of 68502 for did.
Search results 46121 - 46130 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Carl G. Brosinski
on who the jury believed. The jury's disposition of the charges shows that the jury did not believe all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9050 - 2017-09-19
on who the jury believed. The jury's disposition of the charges shows that the jury did not believe all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9050 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and the presiding official. The summons was not published. Franklin did not appear at the hearing or file a WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131631 - 2017-09-21
, and the presiding official. The summons was not published. Franklin did not appear at the hearing or file a WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131631 - 2017-09-21
District II/IV March 1, 2013 To: Hon. Anthony G. Milisauskas Circuit Court Judge Kenosha County C...
in custody. Approximately five months later, in October 2010, counsel, who did not represent Tucker
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93596 - 2013-02-28
in custody. Approximately five months later, in October 2010, counsel, who did not represent Tucker
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93596 - 2013-02-28
2010 WI APP 48
dismissed the complaints because the State did not bring her to trial within 120 days after her request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48275 - 2010-04-25
dismissed the complaints because the State did not bring her to trial within 120 days after her request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48275 - 2010-04-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in. At sentencing, the court found Meekins-Strong not credible. It said that it did not “believe a word” she said
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244067 - 2019-07-24
in. At sentencing, the court found Meekins-Strong not credible. It said that it did not “believe a word” she said
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244067 - 2019-07-24
CA Blank Order
as a new factor, it determined the new factor did not justify modifying Burciaga-Santillan’s sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138018 - 2015-03-23
as a new factor, it determined the new factor did not justify modifying Burciaga-Santillan’s sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138018 - 2015-03-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was baseless and that he had no evidence to support his claim. Newson did not provide transcripts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880289 - 2024-11-26
was baseless and that he had no evidence to support his claim. Newson did not provide transcripts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880289 - 2024-11-26
State v. Malcolm J. Campbell
in the pre-sentence investigation report, he did not specifically object to testimony about Campbell's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7937 - 2005-03-31
in the pre-sentence investigation report, he did not specifically object to testimony about Campbell's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7937 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was that Ross’s claimed new factor did not actually exist, because although the new charges were dismissed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707798 - 2023-09-28
was that Ross’s claimed new factor did not actually exist, because although the new charges were dismissed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707798 - 2023-09-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
did not lack the substantial mental capacity to understand the circuit court proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741286 - 2023-12-19
did not lack the substantial mental capacity to understand the circuit court proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741286 - 2023-12-19