Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46161 - 46170 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 46161 - 46170 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not testify at trial. To prove its case, the State relied instead on testimony from one of the officers who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176615 - 2017-09-21
not testify at trial. To prove its case, the State relied instead on testimony from one of the officers who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176615 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 67
2010 WI APP 67 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP1576
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49357 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 67 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP1576
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49357 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
) Before Brown, C.J., Neubauer, P.J., and Reilly, J. In these consolidated cases, Bobby L. Byers appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98879 - 2014-09-15
) Before Brown, C.J., Neubauer, P.J., and Reilly, J. In these consolidated cases, Bobby L. Byers appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98879 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to say that the State offered no evidence of the items’ value in this case. There was testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
to say that the State offered no evidence of the items’ value in this case. There was testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
Robert Tomaszewski v. David Giera
2003 WI App 65 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-2409 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5643 - 2005-03-31
2003 WI App 65 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-2409 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5643 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Defendants, but whether she was in this case. We agree with the circuit court that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210817 - 2018-04-10
Defendants, but whether she was in this case. We agree with the circuit court that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210817 - 2018-04-10
Evelyn Hommrich v. Allan Rittenhouse
case. ¶4 Hommrich lacked funds to retain subsequent legal counsel and proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15272 - 2005-03-31
case. ¶4 Hommrich lacked funds to retain subsequent legal counsel and proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15272 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an affidavit and a document related to a juvenile case, we granted Van Dam’s motion to seal those documents
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247948 - 2019-10-01
an affidavit and a document related to a juvenile case, we granted Van Dam’s motion to seal those documents
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247948 - 2019-10-01
[PDF]
Michael Eddy v. B.S.T.V. Inc.
2005 WI APP 78 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 04-1664 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18111 - 2017-09-21
2005 WI APP 78 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 04-1664 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18111 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the present case. The court determined, however, that Wakefield could permissibly testify regarding whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377513 - 2021-06-15
in the present case. The court determined, however, that Wakefield could permissibly testify regarding whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377513 - 2021-06-15