Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46171 - 46180 of 83915 for case number.
Search results 46171 - 46180 of 83915 for case number.
COURT OF APPEALS
of Sugden’s knowledge as the case was presented to the jury. ¶6 When determining the probative value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98118 - 2013-06-12
of Sugden’s knowledge as the case was presented to the jury. ¶6 When determining the probative value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98118 - 2013-06-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Morrow’s arguments and we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801205 - 2024-05-14
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Morrow’s arguments and we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801205 - 2024-05-14
State v. Robert J. DeFliger
there was any kind of conversation between them about the case. The court stated that it did not think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2934 - 2005-03-31
there was any kind of conversation between them about the case. The court stated that it did not think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2934 - 2005-03-31
Robert Owens, Jr. v. Shoreline Real Estate Co., Inc.
affirms. BACKGROUND ¶2 This dispute arises from a landlord-tenant case. Owens
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7088 - 2005-03-31
affirms. BACKGROUND ¶2 This dispute arises from a landlord-tenant case. Owens
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7088 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mario D. Harrell
reviewing cases involving a question of law is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis. 2d 549, 554, 518 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5198 - 2017-09-19
reviewing cases involving a question of law is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis. 2d 549, 554, 518 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5198 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the parties’ affidavits and other submissions to determine whether the movant has made a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82287 - 2012-05-09
the parties’ affidavits and other submissions to determine whether the movant has made a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82287 - 2012-05-09
State v. Roger A. Urbick
suspicion if a “reasonable inference of unlawful conduct can be objectively discerned.” In that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14964 - 2005-03-31
suspicion if a “reasonable inference of unlawful conduct can be objectively discerned.” In that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14964 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Nate Wilson
counsel failed to impeach a key witness with a transcript of the witness’s sentencing in a drug case. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4036 - 2017-09-20
counsel failed to impeach a key witness with a transcript of the witness’s sentencing in a drug case. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4036 - 2017-09-20
State v. Jason R. Dodd
that Dubose should apply to his case, despite the fact that it was decided after he was sentenced, because new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24678 - 2006-04-03
that Dubose should apply to his case, despite the fact that it was decided after he was sentenced, because new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24678 - 2006-04-03
Anderson B. Connor v. Sara Connor
, five days after the time for answering expired. He was then substituted out of the case by order dated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15412 - 2005-03-31
, five days after the time for answering expired. He was then substituted out of the case by order dated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15412 - 2005-03-31