Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46181 - 46190 of 83030 for simple case search.
Search results 46181 - 46190 of 83030 for simple case search.
State v. John Casteel
a subsequent order denying reconsideration. The State also claims that prior rulings by us are law of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14220 - 2005-03-31
a subsequent order denying reconsideration. The State also claims that prior rulings by us are law of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14220 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel’s challenged conduct on the facts of the particular case, viewed as of the time of counsel’s conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67019 - 2011-07-05
of counsel’s challenged conduct on the facts of the particular case, viewed as of the time of counsel’s conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67019 - 2011-07-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and incoherent state. At the time, Anderson was out on a bond in a case charging a felony offense of operating
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248085 - 2019-10-09
and incoherent state. At the time, Anderson was out on a bond in a case charging a felony offense of operating
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248085 - 2019-10-09
Jimmy Bridges v. Gerald Berge
. As the respondent correctly notes, when deciding the merits of certiorari cases, we review the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2761 - 2005-03-31
. As the respondent correctly notes, when deciding the merits of certiorari cases, we review the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2761 - 2005-03-31
State v. John Casteel
a subsequent order denying reconsideration. The State also claims that prior rulings by us are law of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14221 - 2005-03-31
a subsequent order denying reconsideration. The State also claims that prior rulings by us are law of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14221 - 2005-03-31
State v. Reginald E. Sims
motion was filed on July 9, 2002, in the robbery case.[2] The circuit court denied the motion on August
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7544 - 2005-03-31
motion was filed on July 9, 2002, in the robbery case.[2] The circuit court denied the motion on August
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7544 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of State Public Defender v. Circuit Court For Walworth County
Brown, P.J., Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 BROWN, P.J. The question in this case is whether WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15795 - 2017-09-21
Brown, P.J., Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 BROWN, P.J. The question in this case is whether WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15795 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745778 - 2023-12-29
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745778 - 2023-12-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
open felony cases and had posted bail in each of them. As a condition of his release, Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974545 - 2025-07-01
open felony cases and had posted bail in each of them. As a condition of his release, Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974545 - 2025-07-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943094 - 2025-04-17
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943094 - 2025-04-17